ArticleFertility and sterility2024
State insurance mandates and racial and ethnic inequities in assisted reproductive technology utilization.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cumulative adverse social determinants of health, prolonged unsuccessful conception, and infertility-related healthcare contact among U.S. women: NHANES 2013-2016.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Trends in infertility treatments by race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and region in US birth certificates from live births: 2011 to 2022.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- In Vitro Fertilization is Essential Healthcare for Patients With Rheumatic Disease.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Review
- Review
- How far is the clinic? Urbanicity and sociodemographic variation in the distance to assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Improving Implementation of Fertility Preservation Benefit Mandates.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.Fertility and sterility · 2025Article
- Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Racial Disparities in Fertility Care: A Narrative Review of Challenges in the Utilization of Fertility Preservation and ART in Minority Populations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine whether the (1) scope of state-mandated insurance coverage for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and (2) proportion of the population eligible for this coverage are associated with reductions in racial/ethnic inequities in ART utilization.
designNational cross-sectional, ecologic study. SUBJECTS: We employed estimates from the US Census Bureau of all women 20-44 years of age living in the US in 2018. Data on the number of women who initiated an ART cycle during that year that were reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were obtained from the National ART Surveillance System. EXPOSURE: State mandates were classified according to the scope of required coverage for fertility services: Comprehensive, Limited, and No Mandate.
main outcome measuresRace and ethnic-specific ART utilization rates, defined as the number of women undergoing ≥1 ART cycles per 10,000 women, were the primary outcomes. As state mandates do not apply to all insurance plans, Comprehensive Mandate utilization rates were recalculated using denominators corrected for the estimated proportions of populations eligible for coverage.
resultsAcross all mandate categories, Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian and NH White populations had the highest ART utilization rates, whereas the lowest rates were among Hispanic, NH Black, and NH Other/Multiple Races populations. Compared with the NH Asian reference group, the NH Black population had smaller inequities in the Comprehensive Mandate group than the No Mandate group (rate ratio [RR 0.33 [0.28-0.38] vs. RR 0.23 [0.22-0.24]). Using the Comprehensive Mandate group for each race/ethnicity as the reference, the NH Black and NH Other/Multiple Races populations showed the largest relative differences in utilization between the No Mandate and Comprehensive Mandate groups (RR 0.39 [0.37-0.41] and 0.33 [0.28-0.38], respectively). Within the Comprehensive Mandate group, the disparities in the Hispanic and NH Black populations moved toward the null after correcting for state-mandated insurance eligibility.
conclusionsRacial/ethnic inequities in ART utilization were reduced in states with comprehensive infertility coverage mandates. Inequities were further attenuated after correcting for mandate eligibility. Mandates alone, however, were not sufficient to eliminate disparities. These findings can inform future strategies aimed at improving ART access under a social justice framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.