Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37774075›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2023

Interpretation of Farnesoid X Receptor Immunohistochemical Expression in Discriminating Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Its Non-Neoplastic Mimics as an Adjunct to Glypican 3.

Doaa E A Salama, Lobna Sadek Shash, Marwa Mosaad Shakweer, Rania Rifat Abdel-Maqsoud, Amany Ibrahim Ahmed Abosaif, Shimaa Abdelraouf Elgohary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Doaa E A SalamaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-5575
Lobna Sadek ShashDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-2691
Marwa Mosaad ShakweerDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Badr University in Cairo (BUC), Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9924-4184
Rania Rifat Abdel-MaqsoudDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0007-9760-0713
Amany Ibrahim Ahmed AbosaifDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine for Girls, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-2765
Shimaa Abdelraouf ElgoharyDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8665-0263
Ain Shams University · EGAl-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsDifferentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-neoplastic lesions may be challenging. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can help in the comparative morphologic evaluation of HCC and its mimics. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a nuclear metabolic receptor essential for bile salts homeostasis and other biological functions of liver cells. Preliminary studies have shown that FXR can be useful for diagnosing HCC. This study aimed to assess the role of Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) combined with Glypican 3 (GPC3) in differentiation between HCC and non-neoplastic hepatic lesions. MATERIAL AND

methodsImmunohistochemistry of GPC3 and FXR was performed in 38 cases of primary hepatic lesions using an automated immunohistochemical stainer. The study included 17 primary HCC cases and 21 non-neoplastic hepatic lesions (5 cases were focal nodular hyperplasia, 7 were regenerative nodules and 9 were dysplastic nodules).

resultsThe percentage of positive GPC3 and low or negative FXR expression was significantly higher in HCC cases than non-neoplastic hepatic lesions (P value <0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of GPC3 in differentiating HCC from non-neoplastic hepatic lesions were 70.6% and 85.7%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of FXR were 58.8% and 100%, respectively.

conclusionThe present work revealed that FXR could be combined with GPC3 in distinguishing between HCC and non-neoplastic hepatic lesions with improved specificity rather than using an individual marker.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGlypicansHumansSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorGlypicansGPC3 protein, humanFXRGlypican 3HCCimmunohistochemistrynon-neoplastic hepatic lesions

Identifiers

PMID37774075
PMCPMC10762761
OpenAlexW4387164469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.