Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37774005›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

cudaMMC: GPU-enhanced multiscale Monte Carlo chromatin 3D modelling.

Michal Wlasnowolski, Pawel Grabowski, Damian Roszczyk, Krzysztof Kaczmarski, Dariusz Plewczynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michal WlasnowolskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-662, Poland.
Pawel GrabowskiDepartment of Information Processing Systems, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-662, Poland.
Damian RoszczykDepartment of Information Processing Systems, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-662, Poland.
Krzysztof KaczmarskiDepartment of Information Processing Systems, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-662, Poland.
Dariusz PlewczynskiLaboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw 00-662, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-7610

Funding

European Commission Horizon 2020 2019/35/O/ST6/02484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationInvestigating the 3D structure of chromatin provides new insights into transcriptional regulation. With the evolution of 3C next-generation sequencing methods like ChiA-PET and Hi-C, the surge in data volume has highlighted the need for more efficient chromatin spatial modelling algorithms. This study introduces the cudaMMC method, based on the Simulated Annealing Monte Carlo approach and enhanced by GPU-accelerated computing, to efficiently generate ensembles of chromatin 3D structures.

resultsThe cudaMMC calculations demonstrate significantly faster performance with better stability compared to our previous method on the same workstation. cudaMMC also substantially reduces the computation time required for generating ensembles of large chromatin models, making it an invaluable tool for studying chromatin spatial conformation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Open-source software and manual and sample data are freely available on https://github.com/SFGLab/cudaMMC.

Indexed as

ChromatinSoftwareAlgorithmsChromosomesMolecular ConformationMonte Carlo MethodChromatin

Identifiers

PMID37774005
PMCPMC10568367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.