Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773610›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2023

Digital Health Reimbursement Strategies of 8 European Countries and Israel: Scoping Review and Policy Mapping.

Robin van Kessel, Divya Srivastava, Ilias Kyriopoulos, Giovanni Monti, David Novillo-Ortiz, Ran Milman, Wojciech Wilhelm Zhang-Czabanowski, Greta Nasi, Ariel Dora Stern, George Wharton and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robin van KesselLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6309-6343
Divya SrivastavaLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-3592
Ilias KyriopoulosLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-8228
Giovanni MontiLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-1198-7889
David Novillo-OrtizDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-0984
Ran MilmanDigital Health Division, Israeli Ministry Of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0009-0002-8285-786X
Wojciech Wilhelm Zhang-CzabanowskiInstitute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0009-0009-8119-3257
Greta NasiDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-4943
Ariel Dora SternHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-1041
George WhartonLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-3636
Elias MossialosLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-9297

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adoption of digital health care within health systems is determined by various factors, including pricing and reimbursement. The reimbursement landscape for digital health in Europe remains underresearched. Although various emergency reimbursement decisions were made during the COVID-19 pandemic to enable health care delivery through videoconferencing and asynchronous care (eg, digital apps), research so far has primarily focused on the policy innovations that facilitated this outside of Europe.

objectiveThis study examines the digital health reimbursement strategies in 8 European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) and Israel.

methodsWe mapped available digital health reimbursement strategies using a scoping review and policy mapping framework. We reviewed the literature on the MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and Web of Science databases. Supplementary records were identified through Google Scholar and country experts.

resultsOur search strategy yielded a total of 1559 records, of which 40 (2.57%) were ultimately included in this study. As of August 2023, digital health solutions are reimbursable to some extent in all studied countries except Poland, although the mechanism of reimbursement differs significantly across countries. At the time of writing, the pricing of digital health solutions was mostly determined through discussions between national or regional committees and the manufacturers of digital health solutions in the absence of value-based assessment mechanisms. Financing digital health solutions outside traditional reimbursement schemes was possible in all studied countries except Poland and typically occurs via health innovation or digital health-specific funding schemes. European countries have value-based pricing frameworks that range from nonexistent to embryonic.

conclusionsStudied countries show divergent approaches to the reimbursement of digital health solutions. These differences may complicate the ability of patients to seek cross-country health care in another country, even if a digital health app is available in both countries. Furthermore, the fragmented environment will present challenges for developers of such solutions, as they look to expand their impact across countries and health systems. An increased emphasis on developing a clear conceptualization of digital health, as well as value-based pricing and reimbursement mechanisms, is needed for the sustainable integration of digital health. This study can therein serve as a basis for further, more detailed research as the field of digital health reimbursement evolves.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsEuropeHumansIsraelPolicyapplicationdigital healthdigital health appEuropeframeworkhealth care ecosystemintegrationmappingpolicypolicy mappingpricingreimbursementtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37773610
PMCPMC10576236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.