Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773503›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

Correlation Between Fundus Autofluorescence Pattern and Retinal Function on Microperimetry in Choroideremia.

Federica E Poli, Imran H Yusuf, Jasleen K Jolly, Laura J Taylor, Daniel Adeyoju, Amandeep S Josan, Johannes Birtel, Peter Charbel Issa, Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic, Lyndon Da Cruz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Gene therapy for choroideremia: progress, potential and pitfalls.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica E PoliNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Imran H YusufNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Jasleen K JollyNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Laura J TaylorNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Daniel AdeyojuNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Amandeep S JosanNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Johannes BirtelNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Peter Charbel IssaNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Jasmina Cehajic-KapetanovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
Lyndon Da CruzInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Department of Health NIHR202821Medical Research Council MR/R000735/1Medical Research Council MR/V029762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In patients with choroideremia, it is not known how smooth and mottled patterns on short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (AF) imaging relate to retinal function. Methods: A retrospective case-note review was undertaken on 190 patients with choroideremia at two specialist centers for retinal genetics. Twenty patients with both smooth and mottled zones on short-wavelength AF imaging and concurrent mesopic microperimetry assessments were included. Mean retinal sensitivities within the smooth and mottled zones were compared between choroideremia patients, and identical points on mesopic microperimetry collected from 12 age-matched controls. Longitudinal analyses were undertaken at 2 and 5 years in a subset of patients. Results: In patients with choroideremia, mean retinal sensitivities at baseline were significantly greater in the smooth zone (26.1 ± 2.0 dB) versus the mottled zone (20.5 ± 4.2 dB) (P < 0.0001). Mean retinal sensitivities at baseline were similar in the smooth zone between choroideremia patients and controls (P = 0.054) but significantly impaired in the mottled zone in choroideremia compared to controls (P < 0.0001). The rate of decline in total sensitivity over 5 years was not significant in either the smooth or mottled zone in a small subset of choroideremia patients (n = 7; P = 0.344). Conclusions: In choroideremia, retinal sensitivity as determined by microperimetry correlates with patterns on AF imaging: retinal function in the smooth zone, where the retinal pigment epithelium is anatomically preserved, is similar to controls, but retinal sensitivity in the mottled zone is impaired. Translational Relevance: Patterns on AF imaging may represent a novel, objective outcome measure for clinical trials in choroideremia as a surrogate for retinal function.

Indexed as

ChoroideremiaHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVisual Field Tests

Identifiers

PMID37773503
PMCPMC10547012
OpenAlexW4387167844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.