Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773477›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2023

Biomarkers for the Progression of Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Eleonora M Lad, Robert P Finger, Robyn Guymer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High risk does not guarantee high accuracy-Evaluating the prognostic accuracy of OCT biomarkers for predicting late AMD.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Spectrum of Functional, Structural, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A MACUSTAR Study Report.Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eleonora M LadDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. nora.lad@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-521X
Robert P FingerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Robyn GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of severe vision loss worldwide, with a global prevalence that is predicted to substantially increase. Identifying early biomarkers indicative of progression risk will improve our ability to assess which patients are at greatest risk of progressing from intermediate AMD (iAMD) to vision-threatening late-stage AMD. This is key to ensuring individualized management and timely intervention before substantial structural damage. Some structural biomarkers suggestive of AMD progression risk are well established, such as changes seen on color fundus photography and more recently optical coherence tomography (drusen volume, pigmentary abnormalities). Emerging biomarkers identified through multimodal imaging, including reticular pseudodrusen, hyperreflective foci, and drusen sub-phenotypes, are being intensively explored as risk factors for progression towards late-stage disease. Other structural biomarkers merit further research, such as ellipsoid zone reflectivity and choriocapillaris flow features. The measures of visual function that best detect change in iAMD and correlate with risk of progression remain under intense investigation, with tests such as dark adaptometry and cone-specific contrast tests being explored. Evidence on blood and plasma markers is preliminary, but there are indications that changes in levels of C-reactive protein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol may be used to stratify patients and predict risk. With further research, some of these biomarkers may be used to monitor progression. Emerging artificial intelligence methods may help evaluate and validate these biomarkers; however, until we have large and well-curated longitudinal data sets, using artificial intelligence effectively to inform clinical trial design and detect outcomes will remain challenging. This is an exciting area of intense research, and further work is needed to establish the most promising biomarkers for disease progression and their use in clinical care and future trials. Ultimately, a multimodal approach may yield the most accurate means of monitoring and predicting future progression towards vision-threatening, late-stage AMD.

Indexed as

Age-related macular degenerationBiomarkersGeographic atrophyiAMDNeovascular AMD

Identifiers

PMID37773477
PMCPMC10640447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.