Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773467›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Breast cancer prediction using different machine learning methods applying multi factors.

Elham Nazari, Hamid Naderi, Mahla Tabadkani, Reza ArefNezhad, Amir Hossein Farzin, Mohammad Dashtiahangar, Majid Khazaei, Gordon A Ferns, Amin Mehrabian, Hamed Tabesh and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PFAS and their association with the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Elham Nazari *Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hamid Naderi *Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mahla TabadkaniStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza ArefNezhadHalal Research Center of IRI, FDA, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Hossein FarzinDepartment of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad DashtiahangarSchool of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Majid KhazaeiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Gordon A FernsDivision of Medical Education, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH, Sussex, UK.
Amin MehrabianWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Hamed TabeshFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Informatics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Tabeshh@mums.ac.Ir.
Amir AvanMetabolic Syndrome Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. avana@mums.ac.ir.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRGonabad University of Medical Sciences · IRNiroo Research Institute · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBreast cancer (BC) is a multifactorial disease and is one of the most common cancers globally. This study aimed to compare different machine learning (ML) techniques to develop a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model based on features of various factors.

methodsThe population sample contained 810 records (115 cancer patients and 695 healthy individuals). 45 attributes out of 85 were selected based on the opinion of experts. These selected attributes are in genetic, biochemical, biomarker, gender, demographic and pathological factors. 13 Machine learning models were trained with proposed attributes and coefficient of attributes and internal relationships were calculated.

resultCompared to other methods random forest (RF) has higher performance (accuracy 99.26%, precision 99%, and area under the curve (AUC) 99%). The results of assessing the impact and correlation of variables using the RF method based on PCA indicated that pathology, biomarker, biochemistry, gene, and demographic factors with a coefficient of 0.35, 0.23, 0.15, 0.14, and 0.13 respectively, affected the risk of BC (r

conclusionBreast cancer has several risk factors. Medical experts use these risk factors for early diagnosis. Therefore, identifying related risk factors and their effect can increase the accuracy of diagnosis. Considering the broad features for predicting breast cancer leads to the development of a comprehensive prediction model. In this study, using RF technique a breast cancer prediction model with 99.3% accuracy was developed based on multifactorial features.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkersFemaleHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestRisk FactorsBiomarkersBreast cancerCancer predictionFactor affectingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37773467
PMCPMC11798178
OpenAlexW4387183359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.