Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773455›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2024

[Proposal for participation in intensive care and emergency medicine studies for patients unable to give informed consent (Cologne Model)].

M Kochanek, G Grass, B Böll, D A Eichenauer, A Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, M Hallek, T Zander, J Mertens, R Voltz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M KochanekMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. matthias.kochanek@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4651
G GrassEthikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
B BöllMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
D A EichenauerMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
A Shimabukuro-VornhagenMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
M HallekMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
T ZanderMedizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinik Köln, Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO), Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
J MertensAmtsgericht Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
R VoltzEthikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When conducting clinical trials in intensive care and emergency medicine, physicians, ethics committees, and legal experts have differing views regarding the inclusion of patients who are incapable of giving consent. These different views on the participation of patients who are not capable of giving consent also complicate how clinical trials are prepared and conducted. Based on the results of a literature search, a consensus model (Cologne Model) was developed by physicians performing clinical research, ethics committees, and lawyers in order to provide patients, those scientifically responsible for the study, ethics committees, and probate (guardianship) judges with a maximum of patient safety and legal certainty, while simultaneously enabling scientific research.

Indexed as

Critical CareInformed ConsentClinical Trials as TopicEmergency MedicineGermanyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationLegal GuardiansMental CompetencyPatient SafetyClinical trialsEthics committeeGuardianshipInformed consentSpousal representation law

Identifiers

PMID37773455
PMCPMC11129979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.