Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773452›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

Impact of formalin fixation on mismatch repair protein evaluation by immunohistochemistry.

Federica Grillo, Murad Ali, Michele Paudice, Simona Pigozzi, Giorgia Anselmi, Stefano Scabini, Stefania Sciallero, Nataniele Piol, Luca Mastracci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Federica GrilloPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. federica.grillo@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-3182
Murad AliPathology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Michele PaudicePathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4188-4247
Simona PigozziPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5339-0629
Giorgia AnselmiMolecular Diagnostic Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Stefano ScabiniOncological Surgical Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Stefania ScialleroMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1325-1701
Nataniele PiolPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Luca MastracciPathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0193-5281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) status in colorectal cancer (CRC) has become fundamental as a diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive factor. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered a simple and reliable approach; however, its effectiveness depends on pre-analytic factors. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different fixation times/protocols on MMR protein IHC quality. Left over tissue from surgically resected CRC samples (cold ischemia time < 30 min) where fixed as follows: standard formalin fixation (24-48 h); hypo-fixation (<20 h); hyper-fixation (>90 h); cold (4°C) fixation (24-48 h); standard fixation for small sample size (0.5×0.5 cm). Samples for each group were collected from 30 resected CRC and the following parameters were evaluated on 600 immunohistochemical stains: intensity of expression; patchiness of staining; presence of central artefact. Forty-six immunoreactions were inadequate (score 0 intensity), the majority regarding MLH1 or PMS2 in the hypo-fixation group (47.8%), followed by the hyper-fixation group (28.1%); cold formalin fixation showed the least inadequate cases. Patchiness and central artefact were more frequent in hypo-fixation and standard fixation group compared to the others. MLH1 (closely followed by PMS2) performed worse with regard to immunostaining intensity (p=0.0002) in the standard and in the hypo-fixation group (p< 0.00001). Using a small sample size improved patchiness/central artefacts. This is the first study specifically created to evaluate the impact of fixation on MMR protein IHC, showing that both formalin hypo- and hyper-fixation can cause problems; 24-h formalin fixation as well as cold (4°C) formalin fixation are recommended for successful IHC MMR evaluation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mismatch RepairHumansImmunohistochemistryMicrosatellite InstabilityMismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1Mismatch Repair Endonuclease PMS2MutL Protein Homolog 1Colorectal cancerFormalin fixationMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch repair proteinsPre-analytic variables

Identifiers

PMID37773452
PMCPMC10673985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.