ArticleMolecular psychiatry2023
Network biomarkers in recovered psychosis patients who discontinued antipsychotics.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychotic relapse prediction via biomarker monitoring: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Brain functional network correlates and predictors of the perioperative antidepressant effect of esketamine in breast cancer patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial using resting-state fMRI and graph theory.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Predictors of relapse after discontinuing antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Addressing brain metabolic connectivity in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a novel graph theory-driven application ofSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Altered resting-state functional connectivity in a thalamo-cortico-cerebellar network in patients with schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are no studies investigating topological properties of resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) in patients who have recovered from psychosis and discontinued medication (hereafter, recovered patients [RP]). This study aimed to explore topological organization of the functional brain connectome in the RP using graph theory approach. We recruited 30 RP and 50 age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). The RP were further divided into the subjects who were relapsed after discontinuation of antipsychotics (RP-R) and who maintained recovered state without relapse (RP-M). Using graph-based network analysis of rs-fMRI signals, global and local metrics and hub information were obtained. The robustness of the network was tested with random failure and targeted attack. As an ancillary analysis, Network-Based Statistic (NBS) was performed. Association of significant findings with psychopathology and cognitive functioning was also explored. The RP showed intact network properties in terms of global and local metrics. However, higher global functional connectivity strength and hyperconnectivity in the interconnected component were observed in the RP compared to HC. In the subgroup analysis, the RP-R were found to have lower global efficiency, longer characteristic path length and lower robustness whereas no such abnormalities were identified in the RP-M. Associations of the degree centrality of some hubs with cognitive functioning were identified in the RP-M. Even though network properties of the RP were intact, subgroup analysis revealed more altered topological organizations in the RP-R. The findings in the RP-R and RP-M may serve as network biomarkers for predicting relapse or maintained recovery after the discontinuation of antipsychotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.