Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773427›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2023

The Right Heart in Congenital Heart Disease.

Alexandra Arvanitaki, Gerhard Diller, George Giannakoulas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra Arvanitaki1st Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, St. Kiriakidi 1, 54621, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Gerhard DillerAdult Congenital Heart Centre and National Centre for Pulmonary Hypertension, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
George GiannakoulasDepartment of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, St. Kiriakidi 1, 54636, Thessaloniki, Greece. ggiannakoulas@auth.gr.
AHEPA University Hospital · GRRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo analyze the pathophysiologic importance of the right heart in different types of congenital heart disease (CHD), summarize current diagnostic modalities, and discuss treatment options. RECENT

findingsThe right ventricle (RV) plays a key role in disease progression and prognosis, either as the subpulmonary or as the systemic ventricle. Volume and/or pressure overload as well as intrinsic myocardial disease are the main factors for RV remodeling. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are important noninvasive modalities for assessing anatomy, size, and function of the right heart. Timely repair of related lesions is essential for preventing RV dysfunction. Few inconclusive data exist on conventional pharmacotherapy in CHD-related RV dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and ventricular assist devices are an option in patients with advanced systemic RV failure. Right heart disease is highly related with adverse clinical outcomes in CHD. Research should focus on early identification of patients at risk and development of medical and interventional treatments that improve RV function.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, RightEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesHumansVentricular Function, RightCongenital heart diseaseImaging techniquesPathophysiologyRight heartRight ventricle

Identifiers

PMID37773427
OpenAlexW4387172865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.