Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773416›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing.

Timothy J Rich, John Palmer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy J RichCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, USA. trich@kesslerfoundation.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-3407
John PalmerDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-4631
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The Effects of Attention in Human Visual CortexR01EY012925 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOYNTON, GEOFFREY M · 1999 to 2018
$5.6M
Gaze, Head Rotation, and Neuroanatomic Correlates of Reading Errors in Neglect DyslexiaK01HD109446 · NICHD · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy John Rich · 2023 to 2026
$502k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012925NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD109446NIH HHS EY12925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with left-sided neglect dyslexia often omit whole words positioned on the left, termed whole-word errors, or commit errors on the left-sided letters of words, termed unilateral paralexias. In addition, the errors have been shown to be exacerbated by simultaneously presented distractors, which has been interpreted as a failure of selective attention. In two experiments, we examined the dependency of these error types on parafoveal versus foveal viewing. The first experiment used a paradigm with parafoveal targets and distractors; the second a paradigm with foveal targets and parafoveal distractors. This enabled a separate evaluation of the influences of stimulus position within an egocentric frame, a two-word allocentric frame, and a within-word allocentric frame. First, regarding whole-word errors, we found the expected spatial and distractor effects with parafoveal targets and distractors. With foveal targets and parafoveal distractors, however, the spatial effect was effectively eliminated. Surprisingly, intrusions from the distractor word were common in distractor conditions. This is consistent with an egocentric account and not a two-word allocentric account. Second, we found that unilateral paralexias remained largely consistent regardless of spatial position or the presence of a distractor. Thus, there is a contrast in spatial and distractor effects between whole-word errors and unilateral paralexias. These results are consistent with three distinct deficits: an egocentric deficit across space resulting in whole-word errors, a failure of selective attention that results in whole-word intrusion errors, and a within-word allocentric deficit resulting in unilateral paralexias.

Indexed as

DyslexiaPerceptual DisordersAttentionFunctional LateralityHumansReadingNeglect dyslexiaReadingSelective attentionUnilateral paralexias

Identifiers

PMID37773416
PMCPMC10635956
OpenAlexW4387184498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.