Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773349›Full record

Trial reportPsychological research2024

Differences in motor imagery abilities in active and sedentary individuals: new insights from backward-walking imagination.

Laura Mandolesi, Noemi Passarello, Fabio Lucidi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura MandolesiDepartment of Humanities, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Porta Di Massa, 1, 80133, Naples, Italy. laura.mandolesi@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-7554
Noemi PassarelloDepartment of Humanities, "Federico II" University of Naples, Via Porta Di Massa, 1, 80133, Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6785-1617
Fabio LucidiDepartment of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-9566

Funding

Department of Humanities, University of Naples Federico II Fondi ricerca dipartimentale 2023 to L.M.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has shown that imagining a complex action, like backward-walking, helps improve the execution of the gesture. Despite this, studies in sport psychology have provided heterogeneous results on the use of motor imagery (MI) to improve performance. We aimed to fill this gap by analyzing how sport experience influences backward-walking MI processes in a sample of young women (n = 41, mean age = 21 ± 2.2) divided into Active and Sedentary. All participants were allocated to two randomized mental chronometric tasks, in which they had first to imagine and then execute forward-walking (FW) and backward-walking (BW). The Isochrony Efficiency measured the difference between imagination and execution times in both conditions (FW and BW). Moreover, we analyzed the ability to vividly imagine FW and BW within various perspectives in both groups through the Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ-2). Findings showed that active individuals performed better in the BW imagery task when compared to sedentary ones (F

Indexed as

ImaginationSportsFemaleHumansMental ProcessesMovementPsychomotor PerformanceWalkingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37773349
PMCPMC10858124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.