Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773311›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

A Preliminary Step Towards a Physical Surrogate of the Human Calvarium to Model Fracture.

Kevin Adanty, Aaron Brice, Yizhao Li, Paris Vakiel, Karyne N Rabey, Samer Adeeb, Simon Ouellet, Dan L Romanyk, Christopher R Dennison

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin AdantyBiomedical Instrumentation Laboratory, NW Department of Mechanical Engineering, 10-354 Donadeo Innovation Center for Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada. adanty@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-124X
Aaron BriceDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Yizhao LiBiomedical Instrumentation Laboratory, NW Department of Mechanical Engineering, 10-354 Donadeo Innovation Center for Engineering, University of Alberta, 9211 116 St., Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E1, Canada.
Paris VakielDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Karyne N RabeyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Anatomy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Samer AdeebDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Simon OuelletDefense Research and Development Canada, Valcartier Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Dan L RomanykDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Christopher R DennisonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Victoria · CADefence Research and Development Canada · CA

Funding

DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory W911NF-19-2-0336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A surrogate model of the human calvarium can be used to assess skull-fracture-related head injuries without continuously requiring post-mortem human skulls. Skull simulants developed in the literature often require sophisticated manufacturing procedures and/or materials not always practical when factoring in time or expense considerations. This study's objective was to fabricate three exploratory surrogate models (1. pure epoxy prototype, 2. epoxy-chalk mix prototype, and 3. epoxy-chalk three-layered prototype) of the calvarium to mimic the calvarium's mechanical response at fracture using readily available and cost-effective materials, specifically epoxy and chalk. The surrogates and calvaria were subject to quasi-static and dynamic impact 4-point bending and their mechanical responses were compared statistically. Under quasi-static loading, all three surrogates showed a considerable number of differences in mechanical response variables to calvaria that was deemed significant (p < 0.05). Under dynamic impact loading, there was no sufficient evidence to reject that the average mechanical response variables were equal between the epoxy-chalk three-layered prototype and calvaria (p > 0.05). This included force and bending moment at fracture, tensile strain at fracture, tensile and compressive stress at fracture, tensile modulus, and tensile strain rate. Overall, our study illustrates two main remarks: (1) the three exploratory surrogate models are potential candidates for mimicking the mechanical response of the calvarium at fracture during impact loading and (2) employing epoxy and chalk, which are readily available and cost-effective has the potential to mimic the mechanical response of calvaria in impact loading.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneCalcium CarbonateHumansMaterials TestingSkullStress, MechanicalCalcium CarbonateBiomechanical testingChalkCost-effectiveEpoxyPragmaticReadily available

Identifiers

PMID37773311
OpenAlexW4387168364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.