Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773171›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Risk of malignant disease in 1-year sepsis survivors, a registry-based nationwide follow-up study.

Johanna Hästbacka, Anna But, Gunnar Strandberg, Miklós Lipcsey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johanna HästbackaDepartment of Intensive Care, Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. johanna.hastbacka@tuni.fi.
Anna ButBiostatistics Consulting, Department of Public Health, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Gunnar StrandbergSection of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Miklós LipcseySection of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University Hospital · SEHelsinki University Hospital · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer and sepsis share risk factors, and sepsis patients may have impaired immune response and increased morbidity long after intensive care. This study aimed to assess whether sepsis survivors are at increased risk for cancer. Our objective was to assess the incidence of new cancer in 1-year sepsis survivors and test the hypothesis that it is higher than that of the general population.

methodsWe obtained data on ICU admissions of adult patients from Swedish Intensive care registry (SICR) from 2005 to 2017. We included patients with an explicit ICD-10 code for sepsis for the primary ICU admission. We obtained data on cancer diagnoses (2001-2018), death (2005-2018) and emigration (2005-2018) from Cancer and Cause of death and National Patient Registry databases of the National Board of Health and Welfare; age and sex-specific cancer incidence rates in Sweden from NORDCAN registry from 2006 to 2018. One-year survivors formed the final cohort, that was followed for new cancer diagnoses until death, emigration, or end of 2018, whichever came first. The main outcome measure was standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) to compare the incidence of cancer in 1-year sepsis survivors to that in the general population (NORDCAN). We also performed several sensitivity analyses.

resultsIn a cohort of 18,550 1-year survivors, 75,427 person years accumulated during a median follow-up (FU) of 3.36 years (IQR 1.72-5.86), 6366 (34.3%) patients died, and 1625 (8.8%) patients were diagnosed with a new cancer after a median FU of 2.51 (IQR 1.09-4.48) years. The incidence ratio of any new cancer over the whole FU was 1.31 (95% CI 1.23-1.40) for men and 1.74 (95% CI 1.61-1.88) for women. The difference in incidence rates persisted in several sensitivity analyses. The SIRs were highest in cancers of gastrointestinal tract, genital organs, and skin. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Compared to general population, incidence of cancer is increased in 1-year sepsis survivors. Variation in the findings depending on follow-up time suggests that factors other than sepsis alone are involved. Surveillance for malignant disease may be warranted in sepsis survivors.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSepsisAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleRegistriesRisk FactorsSurvivorsCancerLong-term outcomeSepsis

Identifiers

PMID37773171
PMCPMC10543324
OpenAlexW4387188100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.