Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773158›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2023

Effect of fermented dandelion on productive performance, meat quality, immune function, and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens.

Jinju Mao, Yuan Wang, Ting Duan, Na Yin, Chenlin Dong, Xuerong Ren, Na Liu, Xiaoping An, Jingwei Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DietaryAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  10. Effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  11. A study on the treatment effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinju MaoCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Yuan WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China. wangyuan@imau.edu.cn.
Ting DuanCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Na YinCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Chenlin DongCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Xuerong RenCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Na LiuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Xiaoping AnCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Jingwei QiCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.

Funding

Major Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2020ZD0004Major Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2021ZD0024-3National Natural Science Foundation of China 32260840the Major Science and Technology Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2021ZD0024-4the Outstanding Youth Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University BR230403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDandelion has a great potential to be used as feed additive. Using microbial fermentation technology to degrade cell walls is conducive to enable better release of bioactive compounds of dandelion. This study intended to explore the effect of fermented dandelion (FD) on production performance, meat quality, immune function, and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. One-hundred and twenty 1-day-old male Arbor Acres broiler chickens were randomly allotted into three treatments: CON (basal diet, control), LFD and HFD (basal diet with 500 and 1000 mg/kg FD, respectively), with five replicates of eight birds each. The experiment lasted for 42 days.

resultsThe results showed that birds in HFD group had increased ADG during 1-21 days (P < 0.05). On day 21, the bursa of Fabricius index of birds in LFD group was higher (P < 0.05), while the serum contents of IFN-γ and TNF-ɑ were lower in HFD group (P < 0.05). FD supplementation decreased the observed_species, shannon, chao1 and ace indexes (P < 0.05) as well as the abundance of Bacteroidota, Bacteroides, and Alistipes (P < 0.05). Birds in HFD group had higher abundance of Firmicutes and lower abundance of Verrucomicrobiota (P < 0.05). LFD group had lower abundance of unidentified_bacteria (P < 0.05). On day 42, the abdominal fat yield of HFD group was decreased (P < 0.05). Birds in LFD group had lower L* and b* values of breast muscle (P < 0.05), while higher spleen index. The CAT activities of breast muscle of FD groups were higher (P < 0.05).

conclusionIn summary, dietary FD supplementation at 1000 mg/kg improved production performance and immune function and modulated microbiota composition in ileum of broiler chickens. FD can be supplemented in the diet to enhance performance and health of broiler chickens, of which 1000 mg/kg FD is more effective.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeTaraxacumAnimal FeedAnimalsChickensDietDietary SupplementsImmunityMaleMeatBroilersFermented dandelionImmune functionIntestinal microbiotaMeat qualityProduction performance

Identifiers

PMID37773158
PMCPMC10540353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.