Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773154›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2023

Understanding inequalities in access to adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic mapping review.

Hayley J Lowther-Payne, Anastasia Ushakova, Adelaide Beckwith, Catherine Liberty, Rhiannon Edge, Fiona Lobban

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Codesign of Mental Health Interventions With Young People From Racially Minoritised Populations: A Systematic Review of Methods and Outcomes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Institutional Abuse, Neglect and Harm in UK Community Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review of the Peer-Reviewed Evidence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hayley J Lowther-PayneLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK. h.j.lowther3@lancaster.ac.uk.
Anastasia UshakovaLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.
Adelaide BeckwithLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Sceptre Point, Sceptre Way, Bamber Bridge, Preston, Lancashire, PR5 6AW, UK.
Catherine LibertyDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, Lancashire, UK.
Rhiannon EdgeLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, Lancashire, LA1 4AT, UK.
Fiona LobbanDivision of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, Lancaster University, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, LA1 4AT, Lancashire, UK.

Funding

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast NIHR200182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation groups experience differential access to timely and high-quality mental healthcare. Despite efforts of recent UK policies to improve the accessibility of mental health services, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding of inequalities in access to services needed to do this. This systematic mapping review aimed to address this gap by identifying which population groups continue to be poorly served by access to adult mental health services in the UK, how access has been measured, and what research methods have been applied.

methodsSeven electronic databases were searched from January 2014 up to May 2022. Primary research studies of any design were included if they examined access to adult NHS mental health services in the UK by population groups at risk of experiencing inequalities. Study characteristics, measures of access, inequalities studied, and key findings were extracted. A best-fit framework approach was used, applying Levesque's Conceptual Framework for Healthcare Access to synthesise measures of access, and applying a template derived from Cochrane Progress-Plus and NHS Long Term Plan equality characteristics to synthesise key findings associated with inequalities.

resultsOf 1,929 publications retrieved, 152 studies of various types were included. The most frequently considered dimensions of inequality were gender, age, and ethnicity, whilst social capital, religion, and sexual orientation were least frequently considered. Most studies researched access by measuring "healthcare utilisation", followed by studies that measured "healthcare seeking". Key barriers to access were associated with individuals' "ability to seek" (e.g. stigma and discrimination) and "ability to reach" (e.g. availability of services). Almost half of the studies used routinely collected patient data, and only 16% of studies reported patient and public involvement.

conclusionsLittle appears to have changed in the nature and extent of inequalities, suggesting that mental health services have not become more accessible. Actions to reduce inequalities should address barriers to population groups' abilities to seek and reach services such as stigma-reducing interventions, and re-designing services and pathways. Significant benefits exist in using routinely collected patient data, but its limitations should not be ignored. More theoretically informed research, using a holistic measurement of access, is needed in this area. REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQ5U7 .

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesAdultEthnicityFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareUnited KingdomHealthcare accessInequalitiesMental health servicesSystematic mapping reviewUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID37773154
PMCPMC10542667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.