Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773102›Full record

ReviewBMC geriatrics2023

Development of the "living well" concept for older people with dementia.

Jiyoung Kim, Nayeon Shin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiyoung KimDepartment of Nursing, Inha University, 100 Inha-ro, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, 22212, Republic of Korea. jy1223kim@inha.ac.kr.
Nayeon ShinUnit manager, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
CHA University · KRInha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important goal in dementia care is how people with dementia can be supported in living well. To this end, we need a conceptualization of "living well" that is suitable for older people with dementia and then develop this conceptualization from the perspectives of both older people and caregivers. This study analyzed the concept of "living well" among older people with dementia.

methodsFollowing Schwartz-Barcott and Kim's hybrid model, this study comprised theoretical, fieldwork, and final analytic phases. In the theoretical phase, we reviewed the extant literature. In the fieldwork phase, we conducted in-depth interviews with 12 participants (five older people with dementia, two family members, and five nurses), followed by qualitative content analysis. In the final analytic phase, we defined the concept of "living well" by comprehensively analyzing the data from the theoretical phase and results from the fieldwork phase.

resultsWe derived physical, mental, and social relationship dimensions of the conceptualization of "living well" for older people with dementia. The physical dimensions were "ability for daily living" and "symptom management." The mental dimensions were "psychological health," "psychological stability," "maintaining identity and growth," and "human dignity." Finally, the social relationship dimensions were "maintaining social relations and community connectivity" and "government support."

conclusionsOur analysis of the concept of "living well" can be used for developing tools and interventions to improve the ability of older people with dementia to live well.

Indexed as

DementiaAgedCaregiversFamilyHumansInterpersonal RelationsMental HealthConcept analysisDementiaLiving wellOlder people

Identifiers

PMID37773102
PMCPMC10542266
OpenAlexW4387157736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.