ArticleTrials2023
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.
Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05491941 (Assessment for Implementation Methods in Sepsis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment for Implementation Methods in Sepsis
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- From feedback to action: a process evaluation of implementation strategies for sepsis bundles in emergency departments.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Timing of Core Sepsis Bundle Elements Initiation in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Target Trial Emulation Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- What Can We Learn from Differences in Hospitals' Sepsis Care?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Peer-to-Peer Case Review as a Strategy to Improve Sepsis Education in Graduate Medical Education.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Article
- The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses.Cureus · 2024Article
- Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU death. In recognition of the burden of sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed sepsis "bundles" (goals to accomplish over a specific time period) to facilitate SSC guideline implementation in clinical practice. Using the SSC 3-h bundle as a base, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a 3-h sepsis bundle that has become the national standard for early management of sepsis. Emerging observational data, from an analysis conducted for the AIMS grant application, suggest there may be additional mortality benefit from even earlier implementation of the 3-h bundle, i.e., the 1-h bundle.
methodThe primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to: (1) examine the effect on clinical outcomes of Emergency Department initiation of the elements of the 3-h bundle within the traditional 3 h versus initiating within 1 h of sepsis recognition and (2) examine the extent to which a rigorous implementation strategy will improve implementation and compliance with both the 1-h bundle and the 3-h bundle. This study will be entirely conducted in the Emergency Department at 18 sites. A secondary aim is to identify clinical sepsis phenotypes and their impact on treatment outcomes. DISCUSSION: This cluster-randomized trial, employing implementation science methodology, is timely and important to the field. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design is likely to have an impact on clinical practice in sepsis management by providing a rigorous evaluation of the 1- and 3-h bundles.
fundingNHLBI R01HL162954.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05491941. Registered on August 8, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.