Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37772750›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2023

Exploring Charge-Detection Mass Spectrometry on Chromatographic Time Scales.

Lisa Strasser, Florian Füssl, Tomos E Morgan, Sara Carillo, Jonathan Bones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa StrasserCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, NIBRT - the National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Foster Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock Co, Dublin A94 X099, Ireland.
Florian FüsslCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, NIBRT - the National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Foster Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock Co, Dublin A94 X099, Ireland.
Tomos E MorganCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, NIBRT - the National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Foster Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock Co, Dublin A94 X099, Ireland.
Sara CarilloCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, NIBRT - the National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Foster Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock Co, Dublin A94 X099, Ireland.
Jonathan BonesCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, NIBRT - the National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Foster Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock Co, Dublin A94 X099, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-2592
National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training · IEMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charge-detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) enables direct measurement of the charge of an ion alongside its mass-to-charge ratio. CDMS offers unique capabilities for the analysis of samples where isotopic resolution or the separation of charge states cannot be achieved, i.e., heterogeneous macromolecules or highly complex mixtures. CDMS is usually performed using static nano-electrospray ionization-based direct infusion with acquisition times in the range of several tens of minutes to hours. Whether CDMS analysis is also attainable on shorter time scales, e.g., comparable to chromatographic peak widths, has not yet been extensively investigated. In this contribution, we probed the compatibility of CDMS with online liquid chromatography interfacing. Size exclusion chromatography was coupled to CDMS for separation and mass determination of a mixture of transferrin and β-galactosidase. Molecular masses obtained were compared to results from mass spectrometry based on ion ensembles. A relationship between the number of CDMS spectra acquired and the achievable mass accuracy was established. Both proteins were found to be confidently identified using CDMS spectra obtained from a single chromatographic run when peak widths in the range of 1.4-2.5 min, translating to 140-180 spectra per protein were achieved. After demonstration of the proof of concept, the approach was tested for the characterization of the highly complex glycoprotein α-1-acid glycoprotein and the Fc-fusion protein etanercept. With chromatographic peak widths of approximately 3 min, translating to ∼200 spectra, both proteins were successfully identified, demonstrating applicability for samples of high inherent molecular complexity.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationTransferrinChromatography, GelChromatography, LiquidOrosomucoidOrosomucoidTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID37772750
PMCPMC10568534
OpenAlexW4387157273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.