Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37772447›Full record

Observational studyDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2024

PERcutaneous transhepatic CHOLangioscopy using a new single-operator short cholangioscope (PERCHOL): European feasibility study.

Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Simon Phillpotts, Michiel Bronswijk, Claudio Cim Conrad, Cecilia Binda, Laurent Monino, Kirill Basiliya, Marcus Hollenbach, Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Hadrien Alric and 15 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-RoblesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-7453
Simon PhillpottsDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Michiel BronswijkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-5022
Claudio Cim ConradDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Medical Department 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Cecilia BindaGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-9684
Laurent MoninoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7922-0396
Kirill BasiliyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Marcus HollenbachDivision of Gastroenterology, Medical Department II, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2654-3164
Apostolis PapaefthymiouDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Hadrien AlricDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre, Paris, France.
Lucille QuénéhervéGastroenterology Department, University and Regional Hospital Centre Brest, Brest, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5443-2579
Alessandro Di GaetaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France.
Mathieu PiocheGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Aria KhaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Diane LorenzoDigestive Endoscopy Department, Beaujon Hospital, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France.
Tom G MoreelsDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Gabriel RahmiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre, Paris, France.
Tom BoekenUniversity of Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Carlo FabbriGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
Frédéric PratDigestive Endoscopy Department, Beaujon Hospital, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France.
Wim LalemanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Christophe CellierDepartment of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, APHP.Centre, Paris, France.
Schalk Van der MerweDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
George WebsterDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
Mark EllrichmannDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Medical Department 1, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA new short device for percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy was recently developed. However, feasibility and safety has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess clinical success, technical success, and adverse events (AEs).

methodsThis observational multicenter retrospective study included all patients who underwent percutaneous cholangioscopy using a short cholangioscope between 2020 and 2022. The clinical success, defined as the complete duct clearance or obtaining at least one cholangioscopy-guided biopsy, was assessed. The histopathological accuracy, technical success, and the AE rate were also evaluated.

resultsFifty-one patients (60 ± 15 years, 45.1% male) were included. The majority of patients had altered anatomy (n = 40, 78.4%), and biliary stones (n = 34, 66.7%) was the commonest indication. The technique was predominantly wire-guided (n = 44, 86.3%) through a percutaneous sheath (n = 36, 70.6%) following a median interval of 8.5 days from percutaneous drainage. Cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed in 29 cases (56.9%), combined with a retrieval basket in eight cases (27.6%). The clinical success was 96.6%, requiring a median of one session (range 1-3). Seventeen patients (33.3%) underwent cholangioscopy-guided biopsies. There were four (7.8%) cholangioscopy-related AEs (cholangitis and peritonitis). Overall, the technical success and AE rates were 100% and 19.6%, respectively, in a median follow-up of 7 months.

conclusionPercutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy with a new short device is effective and safe, requiring a low number of sessions to achieve duct clearance or accurate histopathological diagnosis.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemFeasibility StudiesAdultAgedEquipment DesignEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesbiliary stonebiliary stricturecholangioscopyPTBD

Identifiers

PMID37772447
PMCPMC12136269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.