Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37772294›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders clinical practice2023

Efficacy of Dual-Task Training in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Héctor García-López, María de Los Ángeles Castillo-Pintor, Adelaida María Castro-Sánchez, Inmaculada Carmen Lara-Palomo, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Irene Cortés-Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Héctor García-LópezDepartment of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine University of Almeria Almeria Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-7692
María de Los Ángeles Castillo-PintorSanur Health Medical Center Almería Spain.
Adelaida María Castro-SánchezDepartment of Nursing, Physical Therapy and Medicine University of Almeria Almeria Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-3241
Inmaculada Carmen Lara-PalomoSanur Health Medical Center Almería Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1899-2063
Esteban Obrero-GaitánDepartment of Health Sciences University of Jaen Jaen Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-5500
Irene Cortés-PérezDepartment of Health Sciences University of Jaen Jaen Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1876-1399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dual-task training (DTT) involves simultaneously motor and cognitive exercises. Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of DTT, in comparison to other interventions [single-task training (STT) and usual care (UC)], on gait and balance parameters, motor impairments, activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) immediately post-intervention and at 3, 6, and 12 months after therapy. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA Guidelines through searching in PubMed, SCOPUS, WOS, CINAHL, SciELO and PEDro up to September 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the effect of DTT versus STT and UC on gait (speed, step and stride length, cadence and steps per day), balance (functional and dynamic balance), motor impairments, ADLs and QoL. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. The pooled effect was calculated through Cohen's Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results: Seventeen RCTs with 826 participants and a mean PEDro score of 6.59 ± 1 points were included. In comparison to STT and UC, DTT is effective in improving walking speed (SMD 0.42, 95%CI 0.23-0.6), stride length (SMD 0.69, 95%CI 0.23-1.15), cadence (SMD 0.41, 95%CI 0.19-0.63), functional balance (SMD 1.15, 95%CI 0.92-1.4), dynamic balance (SMD -0.5, 95%CI -0.81 to -0.18) and motor impairments (SMD -0.86, 95%CI -1.25 to -0.47). No adverse effects related to DTT were reported. Conclusions: DTT is an effective and safe therapy for improving gait, balance and motor impairments in patients with PD.

Indexed as

dual‐task traininggaitmovement disordersParkinson's diseasepostural balancequality of life

Identifiers

PMID37772294
PMCPMC10525074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.