SynthesisOntario health technology assessment series2023
First-Trimester Screening Program for the Risk of Pre-eclampsia Using a Multiple-Marker Algorithm: A Health Technology Assessment.
Synthesis in Ontario health technology assessment series, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- First-trimester ophthalmic artery Doppler for prediction of early-onset and preterm preeclampsia: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Placental Growth Factor (PlGF)- Based Biomarker Testing to Help Diagnose Pre-eclampsia in People With Suspected Pre-eclampsia: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2023Pooled it
- Preterm preeclampsia screening and prevention: a comprehensive approach to implementation in a real-world setting.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Trial
- Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- Eclampsia risk prediction across diverse U.S. populations using CDC data: machine learning versus ACOG checklists.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Maternal Serum SHH Levels in the First Trimester as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Preeclampsia.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Visionary AI: Decoding Systemic Vascular Health and Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy Through Retinal Imaging and Artificial Intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Maternal Serum Galectin-1 in the First Trimester as a Potential Biomarker for Early Prediction of Pre-Eclampsia: A Prospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Proteome-Based Maternal Plasma and Serum Biomarkers for Preeclampsia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- One-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Ontario, Canada: a model-based cost-utility analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024Article
- Addressing fragmented early pregnancy care in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pre-eclampsia is when high blood pressure develops after 20 weeks of pregnancy and either proteinuria, maternal end-organ dysfunction, or uteroplacental dysfunction causing fetal growth restriction also develops. The Fetal Medicine Foundation has created an algorithm ("the FMF algorithm") that uses maternal factors in combination with biophysical and biochemical markers to identify people at high risk for pre-eclampsia so that they can been offered acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin) as a preventive measure. We conducted a health technology assessment to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of a first-trimester population-wide screening program for pre-eclampsia risk that uses the FMF algorithm ("the FMF-based screening program"). We also evaluated the accuracy of the FMF algorithm, the budget impact of publicly funding the population-wide FMF-based screening program, and patient preferences and values. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each study using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative tool, and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the FMF-based screening program to standard care (screening for risk of pre-eclampsia using maternal factors alone) from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding a population-wide FMF-based screening program in Ontario. We spoke with people who have experience with pregnancy and preeclampsia and their family members through direct interviews to gather preferences and values surrounding pre-eclampsia and the potential screening program. Results: We included nine studies in the clinical evidence review. The FMF-based screening program likely reduces the risk of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation compared with standard care, when initiated at 11+ Conclusions: The FMF-based screening program is likely more effective than standard care in reducing the risk of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation. Also, the FMF algorithm can improve the detection rate of pre-eclampsia with delivery at less than 37 weeks' gestation or at less than 34 weeks' gestation when compared with conventional algorithms. The population-wide FMF-based screening program is more effective and more costly than standard care. We estimate that publicly funding the population-wide FMF-based screening program in Ontario would result in additional costs of $8.50 million over the next 5 years. Pregnant people and their family members valued the potential equitable access, information, and clinical benefits that the population-wide FMF-based screening program could provide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37772268PMC10530459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.