Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37772249›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing Patella in Total Knee Replacement: When and What to Choose.

Mohamed Samih, Hajar Fadili, Aniss Chagou, Abdeloaihab Jaafar, Bouchaib Zryouil

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed SamihOrthopedics and Traumatology, Cheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Hajar FadiliNeurology, Cheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Aniss ChagouOrthopedics and Traumatology, Cheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Abdeloaihab JaafarOrthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Bouchaib ZryouilOrthopedics and Traumatology, Cheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, MAR.
Université Mohammed VI des Sciences et de la Santé · MAUniversity of Health Science · KH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe opinion on the necessity of patella resurfacing has been deeply divided in the scientific community. There are three approaches to the management of the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The first method involves always resurfacing the patella, the second method involves never resurfacing it, and the third method involves resurfacing the patella only under specific circumstances. Different data support each of these strategies, but no consensus on the best management has been reached.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of 106 cases of TKA (including 29 resurfaced patellas and 77 non-resurfaced patellas), over 5 years, at the Trauma-Orthopedics Department of the Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital, Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences, Casablanca, Morocco. Our objective is to conduct a comparative study between TKA with patella resurfacing and those without resurfacing, by analyzing the functional and radiological results obtained after the operation, to show each technique's advantages and disadvantages.

resultsThe average age of our patients was 65 years with extremes ranging from 46 to 80 years. There was a clear female predominance with a sex ratio of 0.2. The left side was predominantly affected. Primary gonarthrosis was the main diagnosis. Our results showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient satisfaction and Knee Society Score (KSS). Nevertheless, complications generated by resurfacing, such as infection, anterior pain, stiffness, and loosening of the patellar component, as well as additional costs and increased operative time, were observed. In the majority of meta-analyses, there was no discernible difference in clinical and functional results between the resurfaced and non-resurfaced groups, suggesting that patellar resurfacing is not beneficial and, therefore, unnecessary.

conclusionIt appears that regular resurfacing is not necessary. However, there is agreement that resurfacing the patella is the best course of action for patients with inflammatory arthropathy, considerable patella malalignment, and severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis. There are arguments in favor of each of the patella resurfacing techniques, but none of them are particularly compelling, each of these strategies has its advantages and should not be considered bad. The final decision, therefore, rests on each surgeon's practice, training, and experience.

Indexed as

anterior knee painknee osteo-arthritispain after total knee arthroplastypatellar denervationpatella resurfacingpatellar resurfacingpatella surgerytka (total knee arthoplasty)total knee replacement complicationstotal knee replacement (tkr)

Identifiers

PMID37772249
PMCPMC10523826
OpenAlexW4386212819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.