ReviewCureus2023
Acute Intermittent Porphyria: A Review and Rehabilitation Perspective.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Management of Acute Intermittent Porphyria: The Role of Givosiran Therapy in Improving Long-Term Outcomes-A Case Study.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Acute Intermittent Porphyria Triggered by COVID-19 Mimicking Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Diagnostic Challenge.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and natural history of porphyria - a twenty-year population-based analysis in Taiwan.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Clinical Features and Outcomes of Acute Intermittent Porphyria Presenting With Acute Quadriparesis: A Case Series and Follow-Up Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- An easily overlooked disease in the early stages: acute intermittent porphyria.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Beginning of a new era of synthetic messenger RNA therapeutics: Comprehensive insights on mRNA drug design, development and applications.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is an uncommon metabolic disease that impacts multiple organs and can manifest in many ways. It is often misdiagnosed due to its nonspecific symptoms. Neurovisceral signs and symptoms should alert physicians to consider AIP in the differential after excluding more common causes. Identifying the underlying cause is critical in preventing acute attacks, and trigger avoidance is the optimal approach to managing AIP. Medications that are contraindicated should be reviewed thoroughly. Prompt intravenous hematin administration is the primary treatment for acute attacks, and additional pharmacological therapies may be necessary to treat concurrent symptoms. A severe neurological manifestation of AIP is flaccid paralysis or severe motor weakness, which can develop into total quadriplegia and respiratory insufficiency. A comprehensive rehabilitation program is an integral aspect of the treatment plan. Since the incidence of this disease is low, functional prognosis is not well-known. As a result, it is challenging to determine the most appropriate structure, intensity, and duration of rehabilitation therapy. By extending the treatment plan, individuals with tetraplegia due to AIP can continue to make functional gains years after the onset of weakness. Understanding the disease's functional prognosis will aid in coordinating resources and improving healthcare expenditures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.