Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37772034›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2023

General practitioners-community pharmacists pharmacotherapy discussion groups: Analysis of their implementation through a series of case studies.

Florent Macé, Carine De Vriese, Marjorie Nelissen-Vrancken, Martine Ruggli, Mélanie Brülhart, Christine Peyron

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Florent MacéEconomics Laboratory of Dijon, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Carine De VrieseDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marjorie Nelissen-VranckenDutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Martine RuggliPresident of pharmaSuisse, Swiss Society of Pharmacists, Berne-Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Mélanie BrülhartProject manager Quality Circles, Swiss Society of Pharmacists, pharmaSuisse, Berne-Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Christine PeyronEconomics Laboratory of Dijon, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France.
Université de Bourgogne · FRInstituut voor Verantwoord Medicijngebruik · NLUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The evolution of primary care practice has led to the implementation of pharmacotherapy discussion groups between general practitioners and community pharmacists (PPPDGs) in some countries. The aim of these groups is to improve drug prescribing practices and strengthen interprofessional relationships. Objective: To gain more insight into factors involved in successful implementation of PPPDGs. Methods: PPPDG implementation in three countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland), was analyzed in a series of case studies. A grid describing different evaluation criteria was completed by stakeholders in their respective country. The data collection was followed by a literature review. Results: Various models were used to implement PPPDGs within each country and different dynamics were encountered. PPPDGs lead to positive effects on the quality and cost-effectiveness of drug prescribing and on the collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs). Factors involved in implementation were also identified, such as expectations of GPs and CPs, configuration of the implemented model, and the role of CPs in the healthcare organization. Conclusions: This study provides insight into the factors involved in successful implementation of PPPDGs in Belgium, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The findings can be used by healthcare professionals to improve the safety, cost-effectiveness of drug prescriptions and systems in primary care. This study offers a starting point for further research in the field.

Indexed as

Community pharmacistDrug prescribingGeneral practitionerInterprofessional collaborationPrimary care organizationQuality circle

Identifiers

PMID37772034
PMCPMC10523268
OpenAlexW4386753018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.