Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771697›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2023

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Health Care Stakeholders on Implementing a Telehealth Service for Preoperative Evaluation: A Qualitative Analysis.

Eileen Lew, Sean F J Tan, Agnes Teo, Ban L Sng, Elaine P M Lum

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05781789 (Redesigning Pre-surgery Patient Journeys With Telehealth), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05781789 active not recruitingnot on this map

Redesigning Pre-surgery Patient Journeys With Telehealth

TypeobservationalSponsorKK Women's and Children's HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled258ConditionsSurgeryArmsTelehealth for preoperative evaluation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eileen LewWomen's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2143-8007
Sean F J TanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Agnes TeoWomen's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ban L SngWomen's Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Elaine P M LumHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0853-3018
SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre · SGKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGNanyang Technological University · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studies suggest that preoperative evaluation can be effectively conducted through telehealth. As the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated digital transformation, we hypothesize that a new telehealth model of care may be feasibly implemented for preoperative evaluation at our institution. This qualitative study seeks to evaluate the attitudes and perception of elective surgery patients and health care providers toward telehealth conducted for preanesthesia evaluation. Methods: At a tertiary women's hospital in Asia, health care providers and elective surgery patients were recruited by convenience and snowball sampling to undergo one-on-one semistructured interviews regarding a new telehealth model of care for preanesthesia evaluation, under-pinned by the Normalization Process Theory. Data were analyzed, coded, and consolidated into themes using the framework analysis method by a team of four researchers from diverse backgrounds. Results: Twenty-five interviews were conducted among 10 patients and 15 health care participants. Ninety-five codes were identified, consolidated into four themes that connect to guide the implementation of a new telehealth pathway for preoperative care, mapped to the Normalization Process Theory. The themes pertain to advantages of telehealth workflow (coherence), requisites for new telehealth workflow (coherence, collective action), barriers to implementation (cognitive participation, collective action), and enablers of implementation (cognitive participation, collective action). All participants were receptive to telehealth, but health care participants expressed concern about the impact of additional tasks on current clinical workload. Training in videoconferencing was deemed essential by both patients and health care providers. Conclusions: The study has provided insights into levels of coherence and cognitive participation among patients and health care providers. The telehealth workflow should be redesigned, considering systems' constraints and stakeholders' needs. Greater buy-in is needed to gain health care providers' commitment for collective action. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05781789.

Indexed as

implementation sciencenormalization process theorypreoperative evaluationtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37771697
PMCPMC10523403
OpenAlexW4382020876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.