Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771607›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2023

Evaluating LDL-C control in Indian acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients- A retrospective real-world study LDL-C control in ACS.

Madhur Jain, Rahul Sawant, Hitanshu Panchal, Anand S, Anupam Jena, Rahul Gupta, Karthik Kumar, Rajagopal Jambunathan, Sunil Modi, Ajit Mullasari and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lipid-Lowering Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Madhur JainDr Madhu Jain's Clinic, New Delhi, India.
Rahul SawantHridaymitra Cardia Clinic, Pune, India.
Hitanshu PanchalSavita Super Speciality Hospital, Vadodara, India.
Anand SKauvery Heart City, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anupam JenaKIMS Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Rahul GuptaCardium Clinic, Mumbai, India.
Karthik KumarSmile Health Clinic, Coimbatore, India.
Rajagopal JambunathanCauvery Heart and Multi-Specialty Hospital, Mysore, India.
Sunil ModiIndraprasatha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ajit MullasariMadras Medical Mission Hospital, Chennai, India.
Nakul SinhaMedanta Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Kimi ShettyMedical Lead, Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Mumbai, India.
Pallavi KawatraFranchise Medical Head, Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Mumbai, India.
Novartis (India) · INIndraprastha Apollo Hospitals · INInstitute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INMadras Medical Mission · INMedanta The Medicity · INPain Clinic of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) progression. Although lipid lowering therapies remain the cornerstone of secondary ACSVD prevention, there exists residual dyslipidemia. The current study aimed to evaluate the real-world experience related to the treatment patterns and LDL-C control in Indian Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients. Methods: This was a real-world, descriptive, retrospective, observational, and multicentric study conducted across India. The data was collected for 1 year following the ACS event. The change in the levels of LDL-C from the baseline to the follow-up visits and the control of LDL-C, the change in lipid profile, lipoprotein levels, treatment patterns for lipid-lowering, and tolerability of existing treatments were evaluated. Results: Overall, 575 patients were included from 11 centers across India. The mean age of the patients was 52.92 years, with male predominance (76.35%). Although there was a significant reduction in the mean levels of LDL-C from the baseline [(122.64 ± 42.01 mg/dl to 74.41 ± 26.45 mg/dl (p < 0.001)], it was observed that despite high-intensity statin therapy, only 20.87% patients managed to achieve target LDL-C of <55 mg/dL and 55.65% were unable to reach LDL-C levels of <70 mg/dl one year after the event. Six patients reported adverse events without treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: The majority of the patients received high-intensity statins and did not attain target LDL-C levels, suggesting LDL-C control after an ACS event requires management with novel therapies having better efficacy as recommended by international and national guidelines.

Indexed as

Acute coronary syndromeIndex dateIndiaLDL-CLLTStatins

Identifiers

PMID37771607
PMCPMC10523158
OpenAlexW4386807669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.