Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771568›Full record

ArticlePHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2023

Phage Therapy in the Management of Urinary Tract Infections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

Amany M Al-Anany, Payton B Hooey, Jonathan D Cook, Lori L Burrows, Julia Martyniuk, Alexander P Hynes, Greg J German

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biofilm-Mediated Antimicrobial Resistance in PediatricAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Development andMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Treatment ofViruses · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amany M Al-AnanyDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Payton B HooeyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jonathan D CookDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Lori L BurrowsDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Julia MartyniukGerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Alexander P HynesDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Greg J GermanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-7593
University of Toronto · CAMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a problem worldwide, affecting almost half a billion people each year. Increasing antibiotic resistance and limited therapeutic options have led to the exploration of alternative therapies for UTIs, including bacteriophage (phage) therapy. This systematic review aims at evaluating the efficacy of phage therapy in treating UTIs. We employed a comprehensive search strategy for any language, any animal, and any publication date. A total of 55

Indexed as

bacteriophagebacteriuriacystitiskidney transplantphage therapyrenal transplantsystematic reviewurinary tract infectionUTI

Identifiers

PMID37771568
PMCPMC10523411
OpenAlexW4386936381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.