Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771462›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2023

A mixed-methods evaluation of the impacts of an online Carer wellbeing and connection program.

Amy Coe, Jennifer Bibb, Roxanne Kritharidis, Mary O'Mara, Rebekah Lautman, Konstancja Densley, Sarah Kovarik, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes, Matthew Lewis, Victoria J Palmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy CoeThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jennifer BibbThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Roxanne KritharidisThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mary O'MaraCarers Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Rebekah LautmanCarers Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Konstancja DensleyThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah KovarikCarers Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine Kaylor-HughesThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Matthew LewisThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Victoria J PalmerThe Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate a facilitated, 90-min session, delivered for four weeks, Online Carer Wellbeing and Connection Program in Victoria, Australia. Methods: One hundred and three carers took part in the evaluation. Eighty-six completed both pre- and post-program surveys evaluating program impacts on psychological distress, perceived loneliness, and social support. Qualitative interviews were conducted ( Findings: Paired samples Innovation: A model illustrating the mechanisms of action based on the findings of the mixed-methods evaluation is presented to support wider implementation and translation. Conclusion: The online program effectively reduced psychological distress and loneliness and improved carer wellbeing.

Indexed as

And health promotionCarerCo-designConnectednessDistressHealthcareLonelinessOnline wellbeing programPatient and user perspectives and characteristics

Identifiers

PMID37771462
PMCPMC10522856
OpenAlexW4386898807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.