Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771317›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Vaccination therapy for inflammatory bowel disease.

Yafei Liu, Fei Liao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Developing a potent vaccine againstExpert reviews in molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yafei LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fei LiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, several novel medications, such as Ustekinumab, Infliximab, and Vedolizumab, have emerged as potential options for inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) management. Despite achieving some effects in clinical applications, these therapies are still plagued by inadequate response rates and adverse side effects. With rapid progress in immunological research, therapeutic vaccines are gaining traction as an alternative. These vaccines aim to activate the body's immune system to generate specific antibodies, thereby offering a potential avenue for treating IBD. The efficacy and safety of vaccines, coupled with their potential to mitigate the financial and healthcare burden associated with disease treatment, render therapeutic vaccines a more favorable approach for managing patients with IBD. In this review, we critically examine the existing literature pertaining to therapeutic vaccines for IBD, aiming to offer researchers a comprehensive understanding of their applications and prospects and stimulate novel vaccine development by presenting innovative ideas in this field.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesVaccinesHumansImmunotherapy, ActiveUstekinumabVaccinationUstekinumabVaccinesangiogenesisInflammatory bowel diseaseintestinal immunityintestinal microbiotaParasite vaccinevaccination therapy

Identifiers

PMID37771317
PMCPMC10543345
OpenAlexW4387157077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.