Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771265›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Nurses' experiences of using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale with patients in specialized palliative care-A qualitative focus group study.

Ingela Beck, Kicki Törnquist, Anders Gruvebäck, Birgit H Rasmussen, Ulrika Olsson Möller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingela BeckDepartment of Nursing and Integrated Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-6906
Kicki TörnquistInstitute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Anders GruvebäckInstitute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Birgit H RasmussenInstitute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Ulrika Olsson MöllerDepartment of Nursing and Integrated Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-9563
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore nurses' experiences of using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) as a communication tool in specialized palliative care.

designThis study employed a qualitative inductive approach. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research were followed for reporting.

methodsFive focus groups were conducted with nurses from four specialized palliative care units, and the discussions were analysed with quality content analysis.

resultsUsing IPOS for communication with the patient gave an opportunity to understand the patient's care needs and to let these care needs guide care interventions. Prerequisites in terms of relation, atmosphere, skills and flexibility were needed to establish an interactive communication. It was challenging to communicate about issues that evoked emotional reactions in the patient. There was a balancing act between the use of a structured scale and overcoming communication challenges. Nonetheless, when the two complemented each other, IPOS was a useful tool for nurses to promote person-centred care.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingNursesFocus GroupsHumansPalliative CareQualitative Researchassessmentcommunicationend of lifepalliative careperson-centred

Identifiers

PMID37771265
PMCPMC10643850
OpenAlexW4387157401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.