Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37771065›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2024

Changes in cross-sector collaboration between nurse home visitors and community providers in the United States: A panel survey analysis.

Venice Ng Williams, Carol Franco-Rowe, Michael Knudtson, Gregory Tung, Mandy Allison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Venice Ng WilliamsSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS (Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-3579
Carol Franco-RoweSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS (Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Michael KnudtsonSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS (Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Gregory TungDepartment of Health Systems, Management & Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Mandy AllisonSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, ACCORDS (Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science), Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Outcomes Research Consortium · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 77429Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Systems for Action program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess changes in cross-sector collaboration between Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) nurse home visitors and community providers in the United States. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingWe collected primary data via internet-based surveys of all NFP nursing supervisors in the United States in 2018, 2020, and 2021. STUDY

designWe conducted a panel survey to measure changes in cross-sector collaboration between NFP nurses and 10 provider types in healthcare and social services. We assessed relational coordination using the validated seven item Relational Coordination Scale and structural integration using four items adapted from the Interagency Collaboration Activities Scale. Responses over time were compared using one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) and pairwise t-tests. We used the Kruskal-Wallis rank test to assess differences in collaboration by implementing agency type. DATA COLLECTION: All nursing supervisors from NFP implementing agencies in the United States were eligible for the study. Survey implementation was conducted using Qualtrics and administered to all eligible participants (N = 370 [2018], 383 [2020], 414 [2021]). Email reminders were sent every 7-10 days, followed by a final telephone outreach. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe response rate was 71% in 2018, 83% in 2020, and 74% in 2021. Relational coordination scores were calculated as a mean of the seven items and ranged from 1 to 5 (not at all to completely); integration scores were calculated as a sum of the four items and ranged from 4 to 20, where higher scores indicated greater sharing of resources. Coordination with women's care increased from 2018 to 2020 (M = 3.39 vs. 3.57; p < 0.01); while coordination (M = 3.23 vs. 3.01; p < 0.05) and integration (M = 6.50 vs. 5.28 vs. 5.43; p < 0.01) with parenting programs decreased.

conclusionsChanges to cross-sector collaboration varied by provider type, likely due to the delivery of NFP and other services via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is an opportunity to improve cross-sector collaboration in home visiting to better address family needs.

Indexed as

PandemicsSocial WorkFemaleHouse CallsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescross-sector collaborationhome visitingrelational coordinationstructural integrationsurvey research

Identifiers

PMID37771065
PMCPMC10796279
OpenAlexW4387157685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.