Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770866›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Procedure code overutilization detection from healthcare claims using unsupervised deep learning methods.

Michael Suesserman, Samantha Gorny, Daniel Lasaga, John Helms, Dan Olson, Edward Bowen, Sanmitra Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Healthcare insurance fraud detection using data mining.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael Suesserman *AI Center of Excellence, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
Samantha Gorny *Program Integrity, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel LasagaProgram Integrity, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
John HelmsAI Center of Excellence, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
Dan OlsonProgram Integrity, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
Edward BowenAI Center of Excellence, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA.
Sanmitra BhattacharyaAI Center of Excellence, Deloitte & Touche LLP, New York, NY, USA. sanmbhattacharya@deloitte.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) in medical claims have a negative impact on the quality and cost of healthcare. A major component of FWA in claims is procedure code overutilization, where one or more prescribed procedures may not be relevant to a given diagnosis and patient profile, resulting in unnecessary and unwarranted treatments and medical payments. This study aims to identify such unwarranted procedures from millions of healthcare claims. In the absence of labeled examples of unwarranted procedures, the study focused on the application of unsupervised machine learning techniques.

methodsExperiments were conducted with deep autoencoders to find claims containing anomalous procedure codes indicative of FWA, and were compared against a baseline density-based clustering model. Diagnoses, procedures, and demographic data associated with healthcare claims were used as features for the models. A dataset of one hundred thousand claims sampled from a larger claims database is used to initially train and tune the models, followed by experimentations on a dataset with thirty-three million claims. Experimental results show that the autoencoder model, when trained with a novel feature-weighted loss function, outperforms the density-based clustering approach in finding potential outlier procedure codes.

resultsGiven the unsupervised nature of our experiments, model performance was evaluated using a synthetic outlier test dataset, and a manually annotated outlier test dataset. Precision, recall and F1-scores on the synthetic outlier test dataset for the autoencoder model trained on one hundred thousand claims were 0.87, 1.0 and 0.93, respectively, while the results for these metrics on the manually annotated outlier test dataset were 0.36, 0.86 and 0.51, respectively. The model performance on the manually annotated outlier test dataset improved further when trained on the larger thirty-three million claims dataset with precision, recall and F1-scores of 0.48, 0.90 and 0.63, respectively.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of leveraging unsupervised, deep-learning methods to identify potential procedure overutilization from healthcare claims.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDatabases, FactualDelivery of Health CareFraudHumansUnsupervised Machine LearningDeep autoencoderFeature-weighted loss functionFraud, waste, and abuseProcedure code overutilizationUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID37770866
PMCPMC10536726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.