Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770857›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Alcohol policy framing in South Africa during the early stages of COVID-19: using extraordinary times to make an argument for a new normal.

Andrew Bartlett, Matthew Lesch, Su Golder, Jim McCambridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew BartlettDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, England. Andrew.Bartlett@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6927-0899
Matthew LeschDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3015-0937
Su GolderDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8987-5211
Jim McCambridgeDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, England.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-7001

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPublic health and alcohol industry actors compete to frame alcohol policy problems and solutions. Little is known about how sudden shifts in the political context provide moments for policy actors to re-frame alcohol-related issues. South Africa's temporary bans on alcohol sales during the COVID-19 pandemic offered an opportunity to study this phenomenon.

methodsWe identified Professor Charles Parry from the South African Medical Research Council as a key policy actor. Parry uses a Twitter account primarily to comment on alcohol-related issues in South Africa. We harvested his tweets posted from March 18 to August 31, 2020, coinciding with the first two alcohol sales bans. We conducted a thematic analysis of the tweets to understand how Parry framed alcohol policy evidence and issues during these 'extraordinary times.'

resultsParry underlined the extent of alcohol-related harm during 'normal times' with scientific evidence and contested industry actors' efforts to re-frame relevant evidence in a coherent and well-constructed argument. Parry used the temporary sales restrictions to highlight the magnitude of the health and social harms resulting from alcohol consumption, particularly trauma, rather than the COVID-19 transmission risks. Parry portrayed the sales ban as a policy learning opportunity (or 'experiment') for South Africa and beyond.

conclusionsCrisis conditions can provide new openings for public health (and industry) actors to make salient particular features of alcohol and alcohol policy evidence.

Indexed as

Alcohol-Related DisordersCOVID-19Dissent and DisputesEthanolHumansPandemicsPublic PolicySouth AfricaEthanolAlcoholAlcohol IndustryCOVID-19PolicySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID37770857
PMCPMC10537160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.