ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
Double-sided asymmetric method for automated fetal heart rate baseline calculation.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fetal heart rate (FHR) signal is used to assess the well-being of a fetus during labor. Manual interpretation of the FHR is subject to high inter- and intra-observer variability, leading to inconsistent clinical decision-making. The baseline of the FHR signal is crucial for its interpretation. An automated method for baseline determination may reduce interpretation variability. Based on this claim, we present the Auto-Regressed Double-Sided Improved Asymmetric Least Squares (ARDSIAsLS) method as a baseline calculation algorithm designed to imitate expert obstetrician baseline determination. As the FHR signal is prone to a high rate of missing data, a step of gap interpolation in a physiological manner was implemented in the algorithm. The baseline of the interpolated signal was determined using a weighted algorithm of two improved asymmetric least squares smoothing models and an improved symmetric least squares smoothing model. The algorithm was validated against a ground truth determined from annotations of six expert obstetricians. FHR baseline calculation performance of the ARDSIAsLS method yielded a mean absolute error of 2.54 bpm, a max absolute error of 5.22 bpm, and a root mean square error of 2.89 bpm. In a comparison between the algorithm and 11 previously published methods, the algorithm outperformed them all. Notably, the algorithm was non-inferior to expert annotations. Automating the baseline FHR determination process may help reduce practitioner discordance and aid decision-making in the delivery room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.