ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024
Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy of subsequent-line therapies for advanced triple-negative breast cancer: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Post Hoc Analysis of the Phase II DESTINY-PanTumor02 Study: Local and Central HER2 IHC Concordance and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Efficacy by HER2 IHC Status in HER2-Expressing Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the randomized, phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- [Clinicopathological characteristics of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 1+ cases in breast cancer].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Effects of fixation and demineralization on immunohistochemical assessment of canine bone marrow.Veterinary pathology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic reproducibility, spatial heterogeneity, and survival outcomes of HER2-Null, HER2-Ultralow, and HER2-Low categories in invasive breast carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- World Health Organization classification of tumours of the breast 6th edition 2026.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Article
- The value of non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging based on T2-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the study of three-tiered HER2 status in patients with breast cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Real-world study of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with HR+ breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- RareOncology letters · 2026Article
- AI-assisted digital breast tomosynthesis as a decision-support tool for post-neoadjuvant surgical planning in breast cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Noninvasive stratification of HER2 status in breast cancer using multiparametric DECT: a prospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Addressing the Challenges in the Identification of HER2-Low and Ultralow Breast Cancer in Asia: A Delphi Consensus.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.World journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Prevalence of HER2-ultralow breast cancer in South Korea: a multicenter study by reassessment of HER2-zero cases.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Estrogen receptor status low status in breast cancer: clinicopathological factors and prognostic value.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2026Article
- Breast cancer: taxonomy, distribution analysis, risk factors, predictive biomarkers, and modern treatment method.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Prevalence of HER2-low status and outcomes in early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.