ArticleThe AAPS journal2023
Optimization of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Processing for Improved Clinical ELISpot Assay Performance.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- T cell immunomonitoring: a comparative analysis of traditional and novel methods to quantify and characterize human antigen-specific T cells.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Elevated ferroptosis is associated with elevated T cells in patients with heat stroke.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Host cell protein impurities in therapeutic proteins: overview of advances in detection, nonconventional removal technologies and immunogenicity assessment.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- MPT64 antigen-induced immune responses as a novel diagnostic tool for tuberculosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Impact of clinical sample processing time on the performance and T-cell response of the T-SPOT.TB assay.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Cellular Immunogenicity Assessments in CAR-T Cell Therapies: Current Insights and Future Directions.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Effect of delayed isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells on cell viability and functionality.BMC immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell and gene therapies have demonstrated impressive therapeutic efficacy in various human diseases. Nevertheless, cellular immune response directed against these therapeutic agents is an obstacle for achieving long-lasting clinical efficacy. Therefore, it is crucial to develop robust assays to accurately monitor cellular immunogenicity towards these therapies. Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay is one of the primarily used methods for measuring cellular immune response in clinical programs, which requires isolation of the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The quality of this clinical material is one of the most critical factors that impact the robust assessment of cellular immune responses. The optimal blood sample processing conditions, however, remain poorly understood. In this study, we examined the impact of blood sample processing time on the performance characteristics of ELISpot to measure antigen-specific cellular responses. Blood samples that were processed after overnight delay resulted in a loss of ELISpot signals. We subsequently optimized several parameters of sample processing, and successfully recovered ELISpot signals for the blood samples that are processed within 32 h. Furthermore, several mitigation strategies were employed that would potentially address the impact of granulocyte contamination on detection of antigen-specific cellular responses. Our investigation provides an extension of sample processing window for clinical studies and is significant for resolving the logistical challenge of whole blood sample shipment for timely PBMC preparation in cell/gene therapy clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37770755What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.