ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023
Survival analysis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors based on the SEER database: a population-based study.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival analysis and prognostic factors for gastrointestinal and extragastrointestinal stromal tumors: a SEER-based study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Diagnosis and treatment of neurofibromatosis type 1 with malignant transformation and multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term prognosis of peritoneal and retroperitoneal gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Domestic research on extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A ten-year review.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Review
- Survival trends of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in real-world settings: a population-based retrospective study.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An update on gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with a focus on extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs).Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
- Population-based long-term prognosis analysis of subcutaneous gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- The impact of gender on survival outcomes in patients with small intestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis using the SEER database.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Is a soft tissue reinforcing mesh necessary in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for early breast cancer in patients with low-volume breast? A single-center, retrospective Chinese clinical study.Updates in surgery · 2023Article
- Long-Term Prognosis Analysis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the Jejunum and Ileum: A SEER-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Association Between Marital Status and Long-Term Survival in Small Intestinal Stromal Tumors: A SEER-Based Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that originate outside the gastrointestinal tract. However, the population-level survival analysis of EGIST remains poorly grasped. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the survival of EGIST patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
methodsAll patients diagnosed with GIST and EGIST between 2000 and 2019 were identified through utilization of the SEER database. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methodology. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to assess the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
resultsA total of 13,330 patients were enrolled in the study, comprising 12,627 diagnosed with GIST and 703 with EGIST. EGIST patients demonstrated significantly poorer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.732, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.522-1.970, P < 0.001] and CSS (HR 2.167, 95% CI 1.821-2.577, P < 0.001) compared to GIST patients. The mean 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates for EGIST patients were 78.3%, 61.9%, 50.5%, and 32.5%, respectively, with corresponding mean CSS rates of 84.3%, 70.8%, 61.3%, and 46.5%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age, race, sex, grade, size, and surgical type as independent risk factors for OS in EGIST patients, while age, sex, year of diagnosis, grade, surgical type, and radiation therapy were identified as independent risk factors for CSS. Patients with EGIST who underwent surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher 5-year OS rates (49.0% vs. 39.9%, P = 0.035) and CSS rates (63.9% vs. 53.0%, P = 0.028) compared to those who did not undergo surgery.
conclusionsEGIST patients have a poorer prognosis compared to GIST patients; however, surgical treatment has been shown to improve the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.