Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770569›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2024

IQ changes after pediatric epilepsy surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tristan Schmidlechner, Malin Zaddach, Florian Heinen, Sonia Cornell, Georgia Ramantani, Jan Rémi, Christian Vollmar, Mathias Kunz, Ingo Borggraefe

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Seminars in epileptology: Presurgical epilepsy evaluation.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognition in pediatric patients with diagnosis of epilepsyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tristan SchmidlechnerDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstreet 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Malin ZaddachDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstreet 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7584-0811
Florian HeinenDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstreet 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3872-6136
Sonia CornellDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstreet 4, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Georgia RamantaniDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7931-2327
Jan RémiDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9350
Christian VollmarDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-7484
Mathias KunzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-450X
Ingo BorggraefeDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Developmental Medicine and Social Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Dr. Von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Lindwurmstreet 4, 80337, Munich, Germany. ingo.borggraefe@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-5945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review aimed to assess the intellectual outcome of children who underwent surgery for epilepsy.

methodsA systematic review of electronic databases was conducted on December 3, 2021, for PubMed and January 11, 2022, for Web of Science. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The included studies reported on intelligence quotient (IQ) or developmental quotient (DQ) before and after epilepsy surgery in children. Studies were included, if the patients had medically intractable epilepsy and if the study reported mainly on curative surgical procedures. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to determine the mean change of IQ/DQ.

resultsFifty-seven studies reporting on a total of 2593 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 9.2 years (± 3.44; range 2.4 months-19.81 years). Thirty-eight studies showed IQ/DQ improvement on a group level, 8 yielded stable IQ/DQ, and 19 showed deterioration. Pooled analysis revealed a significant mean gain in FSIQ of + 2.52 FSIQ points (95% CI 1.12-3.91). The pooled mean difference in DQ was + 1.47 (95% CI - 6.5 to 9.5). The pooled mean difference in IQ/DQ was 0.73 (95% CI - 4.8 to 6.2). Mean FSIQ gain was significantly higher in patients who reached seizure freedom (+ 5.58 ± 8.27) than in patients who did not (+ 0.23 ± 5.65). It was also significantly higher in patients who stopped ASM after surgery (+ 6.37 ± 3.80) than in patients who did not (+ 2.01 ± 2.41). Controlled studies showed a better outcome in the surgery group compared to the non-surgery group. There was no correlation between FSIQ change and age at surgery, epilepsy duration to surgery, and preoperative FSIQ. SIGNIFICANCE: The present review indicates that there is a mean gain in FSIQ and DQ in children with medically intractable epilepsy after surgery. The mean gain of 2.52 FSIQ points reflects more likely sustainability of intellectual function rather than improvement after surgery. Seizure-free and ASM-free patients reach higher FSIQ gains. More research is needed to evaluate individual changes after specific surgery types and their effect on long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyChildHumansIntelligenceIntelligence TestsTreatment OutcomeChildrenCognitionEpilepsy surgeryNeuropsychologyOutcome

Identifiers

PMID37770569
PMCPMC10770207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.