Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770490›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Computer aided progression detection model based on optimized deep LSTM ensemble model and the fusion of multivariate time series data.

Hager Saleh, Eslam Amer, Tamer Abuhmed, Amjad Ali, Ala Al-Fuqaha, Shaker El-Sappagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hager SalehFaculty of Computers and Artificial Intelligence, South Valley University, Hurghada, Egypt.
Eslam AmerCommunications and Information Technology, The Institute of Electronics, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Tamer AbuhmedInformation Laboratory (InfoLab), College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Suwon, 16419, South Korea. tamer@skku.edu.
Amjad AliInformation and Computing Technology (ICT) Division, College of Science and Engineering (CSE), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Ala Al-FuqahaInformation and Computing Technology (ICT) Division, College of Science and Engineering (CSE), Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.
Shaker El-SappaghInformation Laboratory (InfoLab), College of Computing and Informatics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Suwon, 16419, South Korea. shaker@skku.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. Early and accurate detection of AD is crucial to plan for disease modifying therapies that could prevent or delay the conversion to sever stages of the disease. As a chronic disease, patient's multivariate time series data including neuroimaging, genetics, cognitive scores, and neuropsychological battery provides a complete profile about patient's status. This data has been used to build machine learning and deep learning (DL) models for the early detection of the disease. However, these models still have limited performance and are not stable enough to be trusted in real medical settings. Literature shows that DL models outperform classical machine learning models, but ensemble learning has proven to achieve better results than standalone models. This study proposes a novel deep stacking framework which combines multiple DL models to accurately predict AD at an early stage. The study uses long short-term memory (LSTM) models as base models over patient's multivariate time series data to learn the deep longitudinal features. Each base LSTM classifier has been optimized using the Bayesian optimizer using different feature sets. As a result, the final optimized ensembled model employed heterogeneous base models that are trained on heterogeneous data. The performance of the resulting ensemble model has been explored using a cohort of 685 patients from the University of Washington's National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center dataset. Compared to the classical machine learning models and base LSTM classifiers, the proposed ensemble model achieves the highest testing results (i.e., 82.02, 82.25, 82.02, and 82.12 for accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, respectively). The resulting model enhances the performance of the state-of-the-art literature, and it could be used to build an accurate clinical decision support tool that can assist domain experts for AD progression detection.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBayes TheoremComputersHumansNeuroimagingTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID37770490
PMCPMC10539296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.