Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770271›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Is it feasible to implement a community-based participatory group programme to address issues of access to healthcare for people with disabilities in Luuka district Uganda? A study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study.

Hannah Kuper, Andrew Sentoogo Ssemata, Tracey Smythe, Joanna Drazdzewska, Peter Waiswa, Patrick Kagurusi, Mikey Rosato, Femke Bannink Mbazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK hannah.kuper@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-0023
Andrew Sentoogo SsemataMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Tracey SmytheInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3408-7362
Joanna DrazdzewskaWomen and Children First, London, UK.
Peter WaiswaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick KagurusiAmref Health Africa in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Mikey RosatoWomen and Children First, London, UK.
Femke Bannink MbazziInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR301621Medical Research Council MC_UU_00033/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOn average, people with disabilities face many difficulties in accessing healthcare and experience worse health outcomes. Yet, evidence on how to overcome these barriers is lacking. Participatory approaches are gaining prominence as they can generate low-cost, appropriate and scalable solutions. This study protocol is for the pilot testing of the co-created Participatory Learning and Action for Disability (PLA-D) groups to assess feasibility. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will pilot test PLA-D in five groups in Luuka district, Uganda during 2023. Each group will include approximately 20 members (people with disabilities, family members, carers) who will meet every 2-3 weeks over a 9-11 month period. The groups, guided by a trained facilitator, will identify issues about health and healthcare access and plan and implement locally generated solutions (eg, raising awareness of rights, advocacy and lobbying, establishing health savings and financing schemes). We will collect diverse sources of data to assess feasibility: (1) in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with group participants, non-participants and group facilitators; (2) monitoring of group activities; (3) direct observation of groups and (4) quantitative survey of group participants at baseline and endline. Data analyses will be undertaken to assess feasibility in terms of: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. We will develop and refine evaluation tools in preparation for a future trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study has been received by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and the Uganda Virus Research Institute ethics committees. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants, making adaptations for people with disabilities as necessary. We will reach different groups for our dissemination activities, including (1) people with disabilities (eg, community meetings); (2) policy and programme stakeholders in Uganda and international (eg, individual meetings, evidence briefs) and (3) academics (journal articles, conference/seminar presentations).

Indexed as

Learning DisabilitiesPersons with DisabilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPilot ProjectsPolyestersUgandaPolyestersDevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilityHealth Services AccessibilityMENTAL HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37770271
PMCPMC10546107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.