Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37769460›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2023

Predicting the phase distribution during multi-channel transcranial alternating current stimulation in silico and in vivo.

Sangjun Lee, Sina Shirinpour, Ivan Alekseichuk, Nipun Perera, Gary Linn, Charles E Schroeder, Arnaud Y Falchier, Alexander Opitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Traveling-wave transcranial alternating current stimulation (twtACS) causally links neural timing to cognitive function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sangjun LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA. Electronic address: lee03936@umn.edu.
Sina ShirinpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Ivan AlekseichukDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Nipun PereraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA.
Gary LinnTranslational Neuroscience Lab Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Charles E SchroederTranslational Neuroscience Lab Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Departments of Neurological Surgery and Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, NY, USA.
Arnaud Y FalchierTranslational Neuroscience Lab Division, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.
Alexander OpitzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, MN, USA. Electronic address: aopitz@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · US

Funding

Traveling Wave Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation for the Control of Large-Scale Brain NetworksRF1MH124909 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OPITZ, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2020
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH124909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a widely used noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique to affect neural activity. TACS experiments have been coupled with computational simulations to predict the electromagnetic fields within the brain. However, existing simulations are focused on the magnitude of the field. As the possibility of inducing the phase gradient in the brain using multiple tACS electrodes arises, a simulation framework is necessary to investigate and predict the phase gradient of electric fields during multi-channel tACS.

objectiveHere, we develop such a framework for phasor simulation using phasor algebra and evaluate its accuracy using in vivo recordings in monkeys.

methodsWe extract the phase and amplitude of electric fields from intracranial recordings in two monkeys during multi-channel tACS and compare them to those calculated by phasor analysis using finite element models.

resultsOur findings demonstrate that simulated phases correspond well to measured phases (r = 0.9). Further, we systematically evaluated the impact of accurate electrode placement on modeling and data agreement. Finally, our framework can predict the amplitude distribution in measurements given calibrated tissues' conductivity.

conclusionsOur validated general framework for simulating multi-phase, multi-electrode tACS provides a streamlined tool for principled planning of multi-channel tACS experiments.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsBrainFinite Element AnalysisMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalFinite element methodNonhuman primate experimentPhasor analysisTranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37769460
PMCPMC10955626
OpenAlexW4386898752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.