Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37769002›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Protocol for a cluster randomised waitlist-controlled trial of a goal-based behaviour change intervention for employees in workplaces enrolled in health and wellbeing initiatives.

Lailah Alidu, Lena Al-Khudairy, Ila Bharatan, Paul Bird, Niyah Campbell, Graeme Currie, Karla Hemming, Kate Jolly, Laura Kudrna, Richard Lilford and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lailah AliduInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Lena Al-KhudairyWarwick Medical School, Health Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Ila BharatanWarwick Business School, Entrepreneurship & Innovation Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Paul BirdWest Midlands Academic Health Science Network, West Midlands, England.
Niyah CampbellInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Graeme CurrieWarwick Business School, Entrepreneurship & Innovation Group, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Kate JollyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Laura KudrnaInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.ORCID 0000-0002-8163-7112
Richard LilfordInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
James MartinInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Laura QuinnInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Kelly Ann SchmidtkeUniversity of Health Science and Pharmacy, St Louis, MO, United States of America.
James YatesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.
Prevention Workplace Collaboration West Midlands
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBEast Midlands Academic Health Science Network · GBUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID P OLSON · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Department of Health NIHR200165NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many workplaces offer health and wellbeing initiatives to their staff as recommended by international and national health organisations. Despite their potential, the influence of these initiatives on health behaviour appears limited and evaluations of their effectiveness are rare. In this research, we propose evaluating the effectiveness of an established behaviour change intervention in a new workplace context. The intervention, 'mental contrasting plus implementation intentions', supports staff in achieving their health and wellbeing goals by encouraging them to compare the future with the present and to develop a plan for overcoming anticipated obstacles. We conducted a systematic review that identified only three trials of this intervention in workplaces and all of them were conducted within healthcare organisations. Our research will be the first to evaluate the effectiveness of mental contrasting outside a solely healthcare context. We propose including staff from 60 organisations, 30 in the intervention and 30 in a waitlisted control group. The findings will contribute to a better understanding of how to empower and support staff to improve their health and wellbeing. Trial registration: ISRCTN17828539.

Indexed as

GoalsHealth BehaviorDriveHumansMotivationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID37769002
PMCPMC10538707
OpenAlexW4387141680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.