Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37768950›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Using laboratory data to assess the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on reflex cryptococcal antigenaemia (CrAg) testing in South Africa.

Naseem Cassim, Lindi Marie Coetzee, Manuel Pedro da Silva, Wendy Susan Stevens, Deborah Kim Glencross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naseem CassimWits Diagnostics Innovation Hub (DIH), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4389-2849
Lindi Marie CoetzeeWits Diagnostics Innovation Hub (DIH), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Manuel Pedro da SilvaNational Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), National Priority Programme (NPP), Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9869-5271
Wendy Susan StevensWits Diagnostics Innovation Hub (DIH), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Deborah Kim GlencrossWits Diagnostics Innovation Hub (DIH), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first reported in Wuhan, China. Due to the rapid spread globally, it was declared a pandemic in March 2020. Social distancing and lockdown measures were introduced to limit transmission. These strategies could potentially impact the diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced HIV who are susceptible to secondary infections like cryptococcal disease. In South Africa, reflexed cryptococcal antigenaemia (CrAg) testing and pre-emptive antifungal treatment are recommended preceding antiretroviral therapy initiation for patients with a CD4<100 cells/μl. This study aimed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on CrAg testing in South Africa.

methodsSpecimen-level data was extracted for individuals ≥15 years from the National Health Laboratory Services repository for calendar years 2018 to 2021. Test volumes and CrAg positivity were assessed at national and provincial levels, by age category and gender. The percentage change in annual and monthly CrAg test volumes for 2020 and 2021 (during lockdown levels) are compared to data reported for 2018. The monthly median CD4 and the percentage of samples with a count <25, 25-50, 51-75 and >75-<100 cells/μl were assessed.

resultsSpecimen data of 11 944 929 CD4 results included 1 306 456 CrAg tests. Annual CD4 and CrAg test volumes declined by 22.4% and 27.8% for 2020 and 2021 respectively (relative to 2018). There were 23 670 CrAg positive outcomes in 2018 compared to 21 399 (-9.6%) and 17 847 (-24.6%) in 2020 and 2021 respectively. A monthly test volume reduction of up to 36.6%, 35.5%, 36.1% and 13.3% was reported for infection waves one to four. CrAg detection increased from 6.3% in 2018 to 7.5% in 2020. More testing was offered to males (>56%) with a higher detection rate of 8.1% in 2020. Between 81.0% and 81.8% of testing was for patients aged 20 to 49 years. The monthly percentage of specimens <25 cells/μl ranged from 30.2% (June 2019) to 35.3% (August 2020). Overall, the monthly median CD4 ranged from 39 (IQR: 15-70)(August 2020) to 45 (IQR: 19-72)(March 2019) cells/μl. In 2020, the provincial percentage change in CrAg test volumes ranged from 2.9% to -33.7%.

conclusionOur findings confirmed the impact of lockdown measures on both the absolute number of CrAg tests performed and detection (increase in 2020). A smaller impact on the median CD4 was noted. The long-term impact on patient management in immune- compromised individuals needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Antigens, FungalCOVID-19CryptococcosisAdolescentAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountCryptococcusFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2South AfricaYoung AdultAntigens, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID37768950
PMCPMC10538795
OpenAlexW4387129868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.