Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37768938›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Efficacy of citicoline as a supplement in glaucoma patients: A systematic review.

Julia Prinz, Verena Prokosch, Hanhan Liu, Peter Walter, Matthias Fuest, Filippo Migliorini

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Preoperative predictive thresholds for successful canaloplasty in glaucoma patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Neuroprotection beyond intraocular pressure: game changer or quiet addiction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia PrinzDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3473-7997
Verena ProkoschDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-0637
Hanhan LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter WalterDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Matthias FuestDepartment of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DERWTH Aachen University · DEOspedale di Bolzano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Retinal ganglion cells (RGC), the neurons that connect the eyes to the brain, specifically die in glaucoma, leading to blindness. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor, however, many patients progress despite excellent IOP control. Thus, alternative treatment strategies to prevent glaucoma progression are an unmet need. Citicoline has demonstrated neuroprotective properties in central neurodegenerative diseases. However, conclusive evidence of the effect of citicoline on glaucoma progression is missing. This systematic review investigates first-time the therapeutic potential of citicoline in glaucoma patients.

methodsThe present study was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase were accessed in July 2023 to identify all clinical studies investigating the efficacy of citicoline on IOP, the mean deviation of the 24-2 visual field testing (MD 24-2), retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), and the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) P50-N95 amplitude in glaucoma patients. The risk of bias was assessed using the Review Manager 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.

resultsTen studies were eligible for this systematic review, including 424 patients. The mean length of the follow-up was 12.1 ± 11.6 months. The overall risk of bias was low to moderate. The mean age of the patients was 56.7 years. There were no significant differences in the IOP, MD 24-2, RNFL, or PERG P50-N95 amplitude between patients receiving citicoline and the control group. There was no improvement from baseline to the last follow-up in IOP, MD 24-2, RNFL, or PERG P50-N95 amplitude.

conclusionThere is a lack of sufficient evidence to support that citicoline slows the progression of glaucoma.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleBlindnessCytidine Diphosphate CholineHumansIntraocular PressureMiddle AgedRetinal Ganglion CellsCytidine Diphosphate Choline

Identifiers

PMID37768938
PMCPMC10538785
OpenAlexW4387129996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.