Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37768928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Match analysis and probability of winning a point in elite men's singles tennis.

Iván Prieto-Lage, Adrián Paramés-González, Daniel Torres-Santos, Juan Carlos Argibay-González, Xoana Reguera-López-de-la-Osa, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Santiago

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iván Prieto-LageFaculty of Education and Sport, Observational Research Group, University of Vigo (Spain), Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2569-4999
Adrián Paramés-GonzálezFaculty of Education and Sport, Observational Research Group, University of Vigo (Spain), Vigo, Spain.
Daniel Torres-SantosFaculty of Education and Sport, Observational Research Group, University of Vigo (Spain), Vigo, Spain.
Juan Carlos Argibay-GonzálezFaculty of Education and Sport, Observational Research Group, University of Vigo (Spain), Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2036-6814
Xoana Reguera-López-de-la-OsaGalicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Education, Physical Activity and Health Research Group (Gies10-DE3), SERGAS-UVIGO, Vigo, Spain.
Alfonso Gutiérrez-SantiagoFaculty of Education and Sport, Observational Research Group, University of Vigo (Spain), Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-3833
Universidade de Vigo · ESGalicia Sur Biomedical Foundation · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Notational analysis and new technologies have allowed a better understanding of tactical actions in tennis. In particular, the combined analysis of different variables affecting performance is necessary to understand the relationships between actions in competition. The aim of this research was to analyse the probability of winning a point in men's professional tennis based on the most relevant variables affecting performance in this sport. A total of 4,669 points were analysed on three different court surfaces from the final rounds (from the quarter-finals onwards) of three of the four Grand Slam tournaments in the 2021 season. An observational methodology was applied. Different analysis techniques were used to obtain the results: descriptive and chi-square with a significance level of p<0.05. First serve effectiveness (point won) was 69% on clay, 75% on grass and 75% on hard court. Second serve effectiveness (point won) was around 55% regardless of the surface. The majority of points, between 65% and 77% depending on the court surface, ended with a short rally (between one and four shots). Approximately 80% of the points played with first serve and short rally were won by the serving player. With first serve and medium length rallies, the probability of winning the point is similar between server (range 49-55%) and receiver on any court surface. The study reveals a set of patterns (based on the combination of information from the variables analysed) that determine the probability of winning a point. Descriptive data from this research could help coaches and players on match strategy at the highest levels of elite men's single tennis.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceCompetitive BehaviorTennisAdultAthletesHumansMaleProbability

Identifiers

PMID37768928
PMCPMC10538650
OpenAlexW4387129979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.