Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37768884›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Understanding the cervical cancer self-collection preferences of women living in urban and rural Rwanda.

Varun Nair, Hallie Dau, Marianne Vidler, Maryam AboMoslim, Barbra Mutamba, McKerron Scott, Zoey Nesbitt, John Deodatha, Schadrack Danson Byiringiro, Charles Niyotwiringiye and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Varun NairWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-9236
Hallie DauWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Maryam AboMoslimWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Barbra MutambaEagle Research Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
McKerron ScottQueens University, Kingston, Canada.
Zoey NesbittSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
John DeodathaEagle Research Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Schadrack Danson ByiringiroEagle Research Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Charles NiyotwiringiyeEagle Research Center, Kigali, Rwanda.
Nadia MithaniWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1250-7147
Laurie SmithWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gina OgilvieWomen's Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-4493
Stephen RulisaSchool of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
University of British Columbia · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Kigali · RWWomen's Health Research Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is a leading cause of cancer among women in low- and middle-income countries. Women in Rwanda have high rates of cervical cancer due to limited access to effective screening methods. Research in other low-resource settings similar to Rwanda has shown that HPV-based self-collection is an effective cervical cancer screening method. This study aims to compare the preferences of Rwandan women in urban and rural settings toward self-collection and to report on factors related to self-collection amenability. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June 1-9, 2022. Women were recruited from one urban and one rural clinic in Rwanda. Women were eligible for the study if they were ≥ 18 years and spoke Kinyarwanda or English. The survey consisted of 51 questions investigating demographics and attitudes towards self-collection for cervical cancer screening. We reported descriptive statistics stratified by urban and rural sites. In total, 169 urban and 205 rural women completed the survey. The majority of respondents at both sites had a primary school or lower education and were in a relationship. Both urban and rural respondents were open to self-collection; however, rates were higher in the rural site (79.9% urban and 95.6% rural; p-value<0.001). Similarly, women in rural areas were more likely to report feeling unembarrassed about self-collection (65.3% of urban, 76.8% of rural; p-value<0.001). Notably, almost all urban and rural respondents (97.6% urban and 98.5% rural) stated they would go for a cervical cancer pelvic examination to a nearby health center if their self-collected results indicated any concern (p-value = 0.731). Rwandan women in both urban and rural areas largely support self-collection for cervical cancer screening. Further research is needed to better understand how to implement self-collection screening services in Rwanda.

Identifiers

PMID37768884
PMCPMC10538759
OpenAlexW4387141596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.