Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37768540›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2023

Continued Opioid Use and Adverse Events Following Provision of Opioids for Musculoskeletal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Qiuzhe Chen, Chris G Maher, Christopher S Han, Christina Abdel Shaheed, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Eileen M Rogan, Gustavo C Machado

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuzhe ChenInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. Qiuzhe.chen@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5651-6717
Chris G MaherInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Christopher S HanInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Christina Abdel ShaheedInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Chung-Wei Christine LinInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Eileen M RoganInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Gustavo C MachadoInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of continued opioid use or serious adverse events (SAEs) following opioid therapy in the emergency department (ED) for musculoskeletal pain is unclear. The aim of this review was to examine the prevalence of continued opioid use and serious adverse events (SAEs) following the provision of opioids for musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department (ED) or at discharge.

methodsRecords were searched from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from inception to 7 October 2022. We included randomised controlled trials and observational studies enrolling adult patients with musculoskeletal pain who were administered and/or prescribed opioids in the ED. Continued opioid use and opioid misuse data after day 4 since ED discharge were extracted. Adverse events were coded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and those rated as grades 3-4 (severe or life-threatening) and grade 5 (death) were considered SAEs. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.

resultsSeventy-two studies were included. Among opioid-naïve patients who received an opioid prescription, 6.8-7.0% reported recent opioid use at 3-12 months after discharge, 4.4% filled ≥ 5 opioid prescriptions and 3.1% filled > 90-day supply of opioids within 6 months. The prevalence of SAEs was 0.02% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0, 0.2%] in the ED and 0.1% (95% CI 0, 1.5%) within 2 days. One study observed 42.9% of patients misused opioids within 30 days after discharge.

conclusionsAround 7% of opioid-naïve patients with musculoskeletal pain receiving opioid therapy continue opioid use at 3-12 months after ED discharge. SAEs following ED administration of an opioid were uncommon; however, studies only monitored patients for 2 days. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: 10.31219/osf.io/w4z3u.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnalgesics, OpioidEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPain ManagementAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID37768540
PMCPMC10624756
OpenAlexW4387114327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.