ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2023
SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors for localized dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.ESMO open · 2026Pooled it
- Perioperative Chemoimmunotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone for Gastroesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of sintilimab-based neoadjuvant regimens in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin with sintilimab vs. paclitaxel-S-1-oxaliplatin and docetaxel-oxaliplatin-5-fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.Anti-cancer drugs · 2026Article
- Sintilimab-induced delayed-onset toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with gastric carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Perioperative PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer with PAN metastasis undergoing D2 gastrectomy and PAND: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a single-center, real-world clinical study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in conversion therapy for stage IV gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Article
- Laboratory biomarkers and immunological modulation of sintilimab in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis focused on tumor markers and T-cell subsets.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 for neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Quadruple therapy with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line conversion treatment for unresectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- The impact of combination chemotherapy administration on prognostic outcomes in stage II and III gastric cancer: a comprehensive analysis utilizing propensity score matching.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Envafolimab Inhibits the Growth of Gastric Cancer Cells with Low PD-L1 Expression through the DDX20/NF-κB/TNF-α Signaling Pathway.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Article
- Adverse skin reactions secondary to sintilimab for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- The short-term efficacy of neoadjuvant SOX versus SOX plus immune checkpoint inhibitor following laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in China.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Article
- Article
- Risk factor analysis and nomogram construction of postoperative complications for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy.
methodsData of patients with clinical stage T3-4aN0-3M0 (IIb-III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed.
resultsBetween January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response.
conclusionsThe adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein-Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.